Yeah that's most likely gonna be retracted, seen nothing corroborating it, also just doesn't make sense for the virus to be circulating without spikes in deaths. So many wacky papers have been published, ran in the news cycle, then forgotten about. It's gonna take a year of peer review for the real stuff to float to the top and there be consensus.
I doubt it, it's so virulent that if it was present in a small number of people it would have kicked off mass spread. IMO the most likely thing is that since coronaviruses recombine very often compared to other virus families, that the tests for covid 19 are picking up other coronaviruses. Plus the genetically most similar viruses have been found to be bat viruses in nearby provinces to Wuhan. It also spread from a bat to pangolin then back to bats to humans very very recently, so it had to be somewhere with a pangolin population.
Yeah that's most likely gonna be retracted, seen nothing corroborating it, also just doesn't make sense for the virus to be circulating without spikes in deaths. So many wacky papers have been published, ran in the news cycle, then forgotten about. It's gonna take a year of peer review for the real stuff to float to the top and there be consensus.
deleted by creator
I doubt it, it's so virulent that if it was present in a small number of people it would have kicked off mass spread. IMO the most likely thing is that since coronaviruses recombine very often compared to other virus families, that the tests for covid 19 are picking up other coronaviruses. Plus the genetically most similar viruses have been found to be bat viruses in nearby provinces to Wuhan. It also spread from a bat to pangolin then back to bats to humans very very recently, so it had to be somewhere with a pangolin population.