Eventlesstew@lemm.ee to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoPeople of Lemmy, I dare you to name ONE billionaire that's done anything good.message-squaremessage-square146 fedilinkarrow-up1109
arrow-up1109message-squarePeople of Lemmy, I dare you to name ONE billionaire that's done anything good.Eventlesstew@lemm.ee to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square146 Commentsfedilink
minus-square小莱卡@lemmygrad.mlhexbear6·1 year agoIt boils down to abolishing private ownership of the means of production. The fruits of labour of society must belong to society, not just a handful of people that have been inheriting wealth generation after generation. linkfedilink
minus-squareGarbageShoot [he/him]hexbear2·1 year ago who could take over the role of billionaires without abusing their position of power? The billionaires abuse their power. The problem of an abusive manager being totally solved is an irrational height to set the bar at. link
minus-squareGarbageShoot [he/him]hexbear2·1 year agoBillionaires already represent societal detriments by the very nature of the absurd concentration of wealth into the hands of an individual. Also billionaires tend not to personally manage things, which may be to save time for doing more abuse (see Elon) link
It boils down to abolishing private ownership of the means of production. The fruits of labour of society must belong to society, not just a handful of people that have been inheriting wealth generation after generation.
Removed by mod
The billionaires abuse their power. The problem of an abusive manager being totally solved is an irrational height to set the bar at.
Removed by mod
Billionaires already represent societal detriments by the very nature of the absurd concentration of wealth into the hands of an individual.
Also billionaires tend not to personally manage things, which may be to save time for doing more abuse (see Elon)