Read an interesting bit on A.I and may be applicable to this. Utilizing computer and algorythim to determine efficiency and importance.
"Project Cybersyn in Allende’s Chile was interesting.
The Venus Project is interesting.
SingularityNET is a blockchain project by leading Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) researcher Ben Goertzel which is interesting, and goes in line with decentralisation nicely. Goertzel identify as an anarchist and tend to have ideas compatible with anarchy.
It works like this: anyone in the world can put an AI into his decentralised system. The near-time goal of the platform is to make it into a connection of specialised AIs working together to solve the problem you give it, which could be more general.
Using a platform like this, you could have an interchangeable, democratic human council to prompt questions (“where is it optimal to grow crops in this instance”, “make a full city plan for this area” etc.). The platform could be used as an expert advisor.
There’s another long-term reason to pursue decentralised AI solutions identified by Goertzel: whatever AIs we create today will eventually morph into infants of the human-level AIs of tomorrow. Our best expert estimates give 25 years to human-level AI, and 55 years to Artificial Superintelligence (ASI).
Today, almost all resources going into AI are in the four areas: spying (“surveillance”), killing (“military”), gambling (“stock market predictions”) and brainwashing (“marketing”). If we birth general AI with these value systems, we’re essentially creating a psychopath savant. If instead the AI brain is organised in a decentralised way, we create something more humane."
Read an interesting bit on A.I and may be applicable to this. Utilizing computer and algorythim to determine efficiency and importance.
"Project Cybersyn in Allende’s Chile was interesting. The Venus Project is interesting. SingularityNET is a blockchain project by leading Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) researcher Ben Goertzel which is interesting, and goes in line with decentralisation nicely. Goertzel identify as an anarchist and tend to have ideas compatible with anarchy. It works like this: anyone in the world can put an AI into his decentralised system. The near-time goal of the platform is to make it into a connection of specialised AIs working together to solve the problem you give it, which could be more general. Using a platform like this, you could have an interchangeable, democratic human council to prompt questions (“where is it optimal to grow crops in this instance”, “make a full city plan for this area” etc.). The platform could be used as an expert advisor. There’s another long-term reason to pursue decentralised AI solutions identified by Goertzel: whatever AIs we create today will eventually morph into infants of the human-level AIs of tomorrow. Our best expert estimates give 25 years to human-level AI, and 55 years to Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). Today, almost all resources going into AI are in the four areas: spying (“surveillance”), killing (“military”), gambling (“stock market predictions”) and brainwashing (“marketing”). If we birth general AI with these value systems, we’re essentially creating a psychopath savant. If instead the AI brain is organised in a decentralised way, we create something more humane."
https://philpapers.org/archive/MLLFPI.pdf