archived link https://web.archive.org/web/20230928010556/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaroslav_Hunka

  • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    So there's a separate article about the event and he should just be mentioned there? It doesn't merit two separate articles?

    Cool, where's the article about the Canadian parliament honoring him?

    • Serdan@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yaroslav_Hunka

      The general sentiment seems to be heavily in favor of either keeping the article as is, or rewriting it to be about the event.

      It's interesting how Wikipedia is accused of bias from all sides, by people who can't be bothered to figure out how it works.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Because, for whatever reason, the person who first decided to write an article chose to write it about the person instead of the event.

          You could write an article yourself if you wanted.

        • Serdan@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article about the person is still up.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_process

          Someone proposed deletion due to the subject not being notable. The next step is finding a consensus.

          Currently it looks to me like the article gets to remain as is.

          This is what I mean by not bothering to understand how it works.