Actually lemme go deeper. Look at how inactive the anarchist comm is. Where bread friends at. This site radiates some real weird energies at anarchists.
I think this is more a function of the limited userbase than an indictment of the inactivity of the site's anarchists.
For instance, on main, you have 12,000+ users yet we see the same 5-10 posters providing the bulk of content, and only a few hundred updoots per post - something that hasn't really grown as expected.
c/anarchism comprises just over 10% of that figure, so it's to be expected that there would be a dearth of content - especially when it's kind of redundant: the whole site is supposed to be communists, so if there's anything an anarchist wants to post, chances are they can put it on main.
This comm. needs to carve out its own niche I feel. Most of the posts are bits and pieces of anarchist theory - I'd like to see that expanded to counter the sitewide perspective of anarchists being 'unenlightened/uneducated children'.
Additionally, this comm. could serve as a Q&A sort of place for anarchist topics, as well as be a breeding ground for anarchist memes, though I don't want to see it become a place for people to vent sectarianism just because they get fed up with being a minority on main.
cool lets start! let's refute some tankie talking points from ihstorical and philosophical evidence!
so, the core diff: 'you need a strong central authority to not be crushed by capitalism/fascism'. this seems super hitlery to me. a military history friend once told me that decentralized command structures tend to win. I know for a fact p2p networks are harder to kill.
or maybe arrange activism? anyone else in the redneck CHUD hell dessert of southern california? im thinking edible/droppable cacti seed bombed just sort of around, but I know nothing about agriculture. do cacti even do seeds, or are they like onions?
Actually lemme go deeper. Look at how inactive the anarchist comm is. Where bread friends at. This site radiates some real weird energies at anarchists.
I think this is more a function of the limited userbase than an indictment of the inactivity of the site's anarchists.
For instance, on main, you have 12,000+ users yet we see the same 5-10 posters providing the bulk of content, and only a few hundred updoots per post - something that hasn't really grown as expected.
c/anarchism comprises just over 10% of that figure, so it's to be expected that there would be a dearth of content - especially when it's kind of redundant: the whole site is supposed to be communists, so if there's anything an anarchist wants to post, chances are they can put it on main.
This comm. needs to carve out its own niche I feel. Most of the posts are bits and pieces of anarchist theory - I'd like to see that expanded to counter the sitewide perspective of anarchists being 'unenlightened/uneducated children'.
Additionally, this comm. could serve as a Q&A sort of place for anarchist topics, as well as be a breeding ground for anarchist memes, though I don't want to see it become a place for people to vent sectarianism just because they get fed up with being a minority on main.
cool lets start! let's refute some tankie talking points from ihstorical and philosophical evidence!
so, the core diff: 'you need a strong central authority to not be crushed by capitalism/fascism'. this seems super hitlery to me. a military history friend once told me that decentralized command structures tend to win. I know for a fact p2p networks are harder to kill.
or maybe arrange activism? anyone else in the redneck CHUD hell dessert of southern california? im thinking edible/droppable cacti seed bombed just sort of around, but I know nothing about agriculture. do cacti even do seeds, or are they like onions?