NothingButBits@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml • 1 year agoLibs be likeimagemessage-square50 fedilinkarrow-up170
arrow-up170imageLibs be likeNothingButBits@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml • 1 year agomessage-square50 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareDoubledee [comrade/them]hexbear2·1 year agoThat's actually what Putin is saying. Whereas the US: "Current U.S. policy does not restrict the president’s ability to order a nuclear strike for any reason at any time. The military may reject an order that is perceived to violate laws of war, and there are legal concerns about the role of Congress authorizing the use of force, but as a matter of broad understanding, the president can launch nuclear weapons when and if s/he chose to." link
minus-squarehorsey@lemm.eehexbear1·1 year agoAh yes, for a very honest interpretation of international events I often turn to Putin’s statements. linkfedilink
minus-squareDoubledee [comrade/them]hexbear1·1 year agoOut of curiosity what source do you think would be a better representation of Russian policies regarding the use of nuclear weapons? link
That's actually what Putin is saying.
Whereas the US: "Current U.S. policy does not restrict the president’s ability to order a nuclear strike for any reason at any time. The military may reject an order that is perceived to violate laws of war, and there are legal concerns about the role of Congress authorizing the use of force, but as a matter of broad understanding, the president can launch nuclear weapons when and if s/he chose to."
Ah yes, for a very honest interpretation of international events I often turn to Putin’s statements.
Out of curiosity what source do you think would be a better representation of Russian policies regarding the use of nuclear weapons?