Cappuccinos first popped up as the 'Kapuziner' in Viennese coffee houses in the 1700s. A description of the 'Kapuziner' from 1805 described it as "coffee with cream and sugar," and a description of the drink from 1850 adds "spices" to the recipe.

Either way, these drinks had a brown color similar to the robes worn by the Capuchin ('Kapuzin') friars in Vienna, and this is where their name came from.

Although the name 'Kapuziner' was used in Vienna, the actual cappuccino was invented in Italy, and the name was adapted to become 'Cappuccino.'

It was first made in the early 1900a, shortly after the popularization of the espresso machine in 1901. The first record of the cappuccino we have found was in the 1930s.

'Cappuccini' (as they are known in Italy) gradually became popular in cafes and restaurants across the country.

After World War II, the cappuccino making went through some improvements and simplifications in Italy. This was largely thanks to better and more widely available espresso machines.

These improvements and the post-WWII affluence across parts of Europe set the stage for cappuccino's eventual worldwide popularity.

Question of the day :maduro-coffee: :meow-coffee:

:brace-cowboy: Whats your Favorite Cappuccino/Bean juice with milk


The State and Revolution :flag-su:

:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:

The Conquest of Bread :ancom:

Remember, sort by new you :LIB:

Yesterday’s megathread :sad-boi:

Follow the ChapoChat twitter account :comrade-birdie:

THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:

COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:

Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:

!finance@hexbear.net :deng-salute:

!agitprop@hexbear.net :patrick-lenin: :allende-rhetoric:

!recovery@hexbear.net :left-unity-2:

!neurodiverse@hexbear.net :Care-Comrade:

  • CarpeValde [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Ok, so my ass with limited knowledge of markets met with my buddy who trades for a living to discuss what’s going on. Here’s a take that might interest us:

    What’s going on is multiple liquidity problems caused by over leveraged everything (sound familiar), occurring at an unstable moment economically. There’s huge systemic risks right now, and basically the Meme stonk push could crash the entire market.

    So you have one problem, which is Robinhood. Their CEO basically gave it away on tv when he said that they had to restrict buying because of volatility. Brokers have to maintain enough capital to process payouts from potential sales, similar to a bank that lends, they should e to maintain a certain amount of cash in order to process trading. So every time someone buys a stock, that number goes up. Robinhood doesn’t have the cash on hand to handle the influx of retail traders buying stocks, especially as the price of these stocks skyrocket. They are on the hook for billions of dollars if everybody sold.

    They received an emergency cash injection of a billion dollars last night by their private investors, but still are restricting stocks.

    IF they run out of money and cannot pay out sellers/maintain deposits, they essentially break or fail. In this situation, the SEC takes over, liquidates (sells) every position in everyone’s account and eventually gives that money back. However, that triggers a massive sell off all over the market, and could trigger a panic selling frenzy (and the market is over leveraged meaning there isn’t enough cash anywhere to pay out).

    The other problem is the short squeeze. As you probably know, several hedge funds have made naked short sells on stocks like gme (basically they bet using stocks that don’t actually exist). This is illegal, but also common. What is uncommon is that retail investors noticed, and bought like crazy. Now the price is so high, the shorts will cause insane losses. They have to buy shares at the current price, which costs a huge amount of money, losses in the billions. And since there are more shares they have to buy than exist to be sold, it will drive the price higher and higher as they buy every share available.

    They can hold off on buying to get out of their shorts, but this costs interest. Which, due to how underwater they are, is high. Billions of dollars high. Eventually they will have to exit, causing the squeeze.

    The problem with that? They don’t have enough money to get out. They are insanely over leveraged. They’ll have to sell every other asset to pay this off, causing a broad market crash, and even then, it might not be enough. Then that loss must be covered by their bank, and if they don’t have the liquidity to absorb the loss...it’s 08 all over again.

    But here’s why this is a huge problem for capital. Robinhood could fail if the gme price continues to remain this volatile, and it will if the hedge funds don’t exit their position. And if the hedge funds give in and exit, causes the above. So basically, there’s a liquidity trap coming one way or another, and not a lot of options to avoid it.

    That’s why the broader markets have been selling this week. Very dangerous situation either way.

    And key differences between this and 08: voters don’t have any electoral means to give their opinion for a few years, populist anger in all directions is very very high but banks and billionaires have attracted near universal ire, the fed has far fewer tools for what would be a much bigger bubble, and the pandemic makes any speedy economic recovery nearly hopeless. All adds up to extreme risk, and obviously a lot of suffering on the line.

    Sorry for the long post, but I’m curious if anyone here has any thoughts about this or what we can do in this moment.

    • spectre [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      This is a great post, but probably best suited for c/finance if you haven't posted it there already

    • unperson [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Robinhood doesn’t have the cash on hand to handle the influx of retail traders buying stocks, especially as the price of these stocks skyrocket. They are on the hook for billions of dollars if everybody sold.

      Can you ask them to explain why this is a problem? Would they not have the billions of dollars incoming from the stock sales if everybody sold?

      • CarpeValde [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The real problem is the deposits required. Suddenly gamestop stocks being worth 2000% what they were, meant 2000% more deposits required for robinhood.

        If there is a a rush of selling and withdrawing of cash, robinhood also needs liquidity to process and move those transactions, as it’s not as simple as moving the numbers on the spreadsheet. Ordinarily this isn’t a problem but the scale makes the liquidity in hand too tight, which can cause failures.

      • CarpeValde [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Possibly. Kinda the complete version of what happened yesterday, when robinhood and other brokers wouldn’t allow buying. Less buyers means lower prices as people try to sell, lowering the price helps the hedge funds stem their losses and possibly cover their positions completely.

        If all positions were liquidated, though, it’s like a mass sell off. The price of stocks across the board would fall rapidly, particularly things like gme where so many shares are held by Robin Hood users.