It depends. It's common in workplaces like this and similar situations the workers/people lower in the hierarchy have a kind of stockholm syndrome where they actually want the higher ups to be hard and borderline abusive because "that's the way it is/should be" and so they can perpetuate the cycle of abuse if/when they get the rare chance to be the higher up. It's an extreme version of the "temporarily embarrassed millionaire" situation. For instance the person that made this post is against unionisation now that they have a restaurant, wonder why???
Should still try to organise and unionize regardless, you never know if you don't try.
Yeah. Also if the contestants on hell's kitchen or something are very likely to be executive chefs of their own restaurant before going on, which is another added factor.
It depends. It's common in workplaces like this and similar situations the workers/people lower in the hierarchy have a kind of stockholm syndrome where they actually want the higher ups to be hard and borderline abusive because "that's the way it is/should be" and so they can perpetuate the cycle of abuse if/when they get the rare chance to be the higher up. It's an extreme version of the "temporarily embarrassed millionaire" situation. For instance the person that made this post is against unionisation now that they have a restaurant, wonder why???
Should still try to organise and unionize regardless, you never know if you don't try.
Something about when your ideology isn't about liberation you end up pining to be the oppressor.
Yeah. Also if the contestants on hell's kitchen or something are very likely to be executive chefs of their own restaurant before going on, which is another added factor.
they dont want to stop the exploitation, they want to become the exploiters :quark: