Round 1: 200 votes for Jordan

Round 2: 199 votes for Jordan

Round 3: 194 votes for Jordan

Additional detractors this round:

Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA): Jordan round 2, McHenry round 3

Tom Kean Jr. (R-NY): Jordan round 2, McCarthy round 3

Marc Molinaro (R-NY): Jordan round 2, Zeldin round 3

Other GOP changes:

Wesley Hunt (R-TX): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

Derrick Van Orden (R-WI): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

  • demonquark@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read somewhere that a group of 55 republicans who plan to make sure he gets less votes every round. To rub in how much they don’t want him.

  • paprika@infosec.pub
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember how they used to say: Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line?

    I don't think they can say that one anymore.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those numbers are going in the wrong direction, guy. I think you should bow out. But I hope you’re dumb enough to keep going.

    Repubs are the greatest impediment to progress. Dems are the second greatest.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this was 'House of Cards'

    Dems would offer Blue state GOPs who voted for Jeffries easy wins in November. The ten or so voted he'd need would be offset by loses in other states.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        True story. After the 2016 election, there was a panel discussion with the creators of House of Cards, Scandal, The West Wing, and all the other US political TV shows. All the participants said the same thing; if they'd had a character denigrate American POWs the way Trump did in real life, the networks and advertisers would have demanded that the character be treated like a pariah on the show. We're already beyond anything fictional TV could allow.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          "Reality is stranger than what TV advertisers can imagine" is a lot less interesting than "reality is stranger than fiction"

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't know if that's a good idea honestly. First, they'd be giving up winnable seats in the future. Second, it'd be Democrats in charge of a republican controlled house. Sure, they could put up things they want for a vote, but stupid people would now think they're responsible for the nothing that gets done. Letting Republicans tear each other apart is probably better politically without major concessions.