Then arguing with people about whether the kernels popping is "justified".
Trying to focus on the slaughter of regular Israelis and whether it's good or evil to attack civilians is just such a ridiculous approach to me. The question has no meaning in this context. If you don't want kernels to pop take the pot off of the flame, if you refuse to do that then shut the fuck up about it.
Like obviously it sucks that everyday people were intentionally killed but the blame is just being put on the entirely wrong place, it's just individualist moralism that works to strip the event of any context. It feels like it's a rhetorical funnel whose function is to push those who engage in this moralizing to the next logical point in the talking-point journey: whether Israel has a right to defend itself.
So, can I assume you're in favor of ethnic cleansing Russian settlers from east Ukraine and Crimea?
How does that make sense? Russians in East Ukraine were not stealing land from Ukrainians. They wanted to secede before and after Euromaidan and Ukrainian nazis were the ones attempting to steal their land. They literally ASKED Russia for security, and the bloodless Russian invasion of Crimea following an increase of support for secession corroborates this.
How do you have it so backward as to compare Ukraine to Palestine and Ukrainian civilians under siege to Israeli settlers??
You know east Ukraine was ethnically russian and added on to the Ukraine SSR by the soviet union right?
Ukraine was the one that was doing ethnic cleansing in eastern Ukraine. And yes we were against that.