BilboBaggins [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2022

help-circle

  • BilboBaggins [he/him]tonews*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    OK here we go...

    In the 60s and 70s, LotR was way more closely associated with hippies than anything on the right. When I was a kid in the 80s and 90s, religious right wingers would lump it in with the satanic panic (I wasn't allowed to read it). All this fashy love for LotR is after the movies came out, and I don't think it's a coincidence.

    I bet you dollars to donuts the fash who like LotR don't even read the books. The movies - in particular the last 2 - overly emphasize the "WE MUST DEFEND THE WEST FROM THE EVIL HORDES" aspect. I'm not saying that's not there in the books but the movies over-emphasize it quite a bit. I actually rewatched the trilogy for the first time in a decade recently and was surprised how uncomfortable the last 2 movies made me. The movies do feel like they're coded with fash dogwhistles in a way the books are not. I would say the "vibe" of the first movie is more aligned with all 3 books way better than the last 2 movies are.

    I also thinks it's as simple as the story is very "European" and so the "RETVRN TO TRADITION" crowd loves it just for that aspect alone, especially the movies.

    But also as Ulysses said, I think there are aspects of the story like the elves that I don't think Tolkien had any ill intent, but is definitely easy for fascists to dovetail into their own worldview.

    I understand this is a pretty weak defense but I think it's important to recognize before the movies came out the books had a very broad base of fans and the notion that it was the darling of the right (Meloni excluded I guess) isn't really accurate. At the same time I can acknowledge even the books have problematic aspects.

    I actually plan on re-reading the trilogy this winter for the first time as a leftist. I'm curious to see how I'll feel about it then.








  • BilboBaggins [he/him]toHistoryHolodomor is Nazi Propaganda.
    ·
    2 years ago

    the last in a long series of famines in that part of the world

    Sorry I don't remember where I heard it, but my understanding is that Russia in the 19th century experienced 5 major famines that together killed about 40 million people.




  • the demise of applied Marxism in the Socialist Calculation Debate of the 1920s.

    The calculation debate was going on before computers were invented and the Soviets were doing their economic planning with pen and paper. Even without computers, Soviet central planning worked out pretty well and things only got messed up as Corn Man introduced more market-based approaches.

    Regardless, the calculation debate was settled decades ago. Computers ended up being the game changers. Cybersyn worked pretty well even using tech that was a little outdated at the time (US pressured IBM not to sell them the good computers Allende wanted). Socialists have been able to prove the superiority of central planning mathematically since at least the 80s. The debate is over, there is no debate. We won.



  • BilboBaggins [he/him]totechnologyYour iPhone may soon have more ads
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Article says it's allowing business to pay for higher-up search results; while not great it's not like you're gonna get a "punch the monkey" banner in iTunes.

    IMO a custom security-focused ROM on a Pixel is the best for privacy and security. But then I'll take an iPhone over everything else (Samsung, Moto, stock Android Pixel, Pinephone) after that. At least iPhone with iCloud disabled.





  • Then what is the outcome? That their product becomes cheaper!

    Yup. "Innovation" is what we're told is the secret sauce as to why capitalism is the greatest economic system ever. A capitalist innovates and implements some better process or equipment because even if it eventually causes the rate of profit to remain unchanged, before that happens the capitalist is able to make super-profits. But as capitalism moves to ever-increasing degrees of monopoly, that innovation advantage completely dries up.