I'm not asking about the supposed harrassment. Only one of those accounts says it was banned for harrassment.
I'm asking about the supposed transphobia.
Where are their examples of transphobia. Why is this so hard for you to produce, if it actually exists?
Still no quotes. Odd.
You posting in bad faith proves nothing about whether anyone else is posting in bad faith.
Saying you support rachel's opinion is not being an asshole, you dismissive jerk.
So, disagreeing with you.
You have provided nothing except for revealing the fact that you will happily excommunicate and strip the transness from any person you disagree with, with no disregard for how that might affect their dysphoria.
Might as well skipped all this wasted time and said you just like throwing trans people under the bus for your own amusment.
So if you site pin something, and people post in it and get too uppity for you, that's banworthy?
What exactly is the point of site pinning it if not to bring it to the attention to the whole site?
That's not one of the bans I was referencing, nor is it one of the bans refernced by Alfred.
Why can't you produce any actual transphobic quotes from the bans in question? Shouldn't be that hard if the transphobia was so obvious, right?
Obvious based on what?
Still no quotes, huh?
I'm going to assume the downvotes without any quotes as evidence means that there aren't any actual instances of transphobia to quote, and the mod team is infact appropriating and chapening the term to feed their petty Reddit mod powerplays, at the expense of the trans community as a whole.
So if you have no evidence whatsover that they were "a brigade of cis people", and your response depends on the assumption that they were "a brigade of cis people", doesn't that make your response complete shit?
And wouldn't it be really fucking bad of you to misgender someone by calling them "a brigade of cis people" if they aren't, in fact, cis? Why would you risk doing that if your concern for the feelings of trans people was genuine?
And what exactly does "non-community" mean if they had accounts, previous posting history and you have no evidence that they weren't trans themselves? Does "non-community" just mean "you, personally, don't like them"?
I was following that thread and saw nothing that was outright transphobia. I saw people telling rachel they supported her, I saw people arguing about quotation marks, and people accusing each other of being overly aggressive. None of those meets the definition of transphobia.
What, exactly, met your definition of transphobia. Unless, of course, you are intentionally appropriating that word to mean "anyone I want to ban at any moment for reasons I can't say out loud".
Any quotes? Any slurs? Any references to biological determinism or transmedicalism or how gender norms should be maintained? Anything?
I am well aware that you think the thesis of "don't erase trans experiences and call them cishet men" is shit.
Every ban in the thread I linked to. Every one of them got randomly banned seemingly for defending rachel.
So to be clear, you think pronoun tags are serious business, but potentially swelling the ranks of /r/stupidpol is a funny joke?
What evidence do you have that they were cis aside from the fact that they apparently disagree with you?
I was lurking here for about a month. This struggle session made me suspicious, and the wave of bans for nothing encouraged me to make this account to express my opinion.
I'll be leaving after this, because I'm already getting downvoted for saying that chasing potential allies to /r/stupidpol is bad. Any community who thinks it's funny to chase people into the arms of transphobes and bigots is no community for me. Bye.
lmfao for getting downvoted for saying stupidpol is bad.
this site really showing their true colors
Also pointing out that if this overzealous, petty shit resulted in even one person fucking off to /r/stupidpol like some people here clearly want them to (some people here literally saying "fuck off to /r/stupidpol" as if that's somehow a victory), then this has has contributed dont more to help the TERF and nazbol movements than it has to building leftist movements.
But the mods here clearly don't care about that. They're insulated from whatver might come from those reactionary tendencies being reinforced by this shit.
Made a post, and not a single mod could produce a single evidence of transphobia from the accounts in question. Not even a bad example, literally couldn't provide anything.
Then locked the thread when it was clearly they had no evidence to produce.
Cowardly, petty shit. The Chapos were right about the sub; you nerds are way to petty and needlessly vindictive to be anything but a detriment to the leftist movement.
Peace, have fun with your next idiotic circle firing squad.