And just like that my opinion of the steam forums skyrocketed.

Oh, I like the new name!

This is the result of having too many "nothing to hide" idiots.

They are all meaning to say "not my problem", but all they're doing is create problems for themselves and their kids. They only notice, as always with privacy, when it's entirely too late.

Street smart

It's really hard to establish privacy in this age. Everything store bought will fight you on it. And everything store bought will fight different solutions, so it's harder to stay in contact with your friends; or get them to change with you. It's just way easier to fight the "newcomers". And that's a start at least.

We will scan the brain for a safe way to cut it, so we can mix it with cut bread like two stacks of cards

Sucks for them, but this is the wrong way. Except if I can work my own exclusive system, or a system from another service provider into this. Previous to the stealing, of course. And without anyone needing to "allow" me

More drivers = more good

, but I really would like the karmic justice of telling windows users to write their own kernels drivers if they want them. Let them cook for a few years.

Do you take Advantage off babysitters?

Warning, no technical stuff, only creed:

I don't hate Windows in and off itself. For me it represents my first contact with a computer and influences my choice of UI to this day.

I hate what it stands for, which for me is something I call "gated computing"; a restriction of access to computational power and abilities. It turns a machine with near limitless potential, like watching cat videos, sharing how to best build bridges or calculating the bygone cycles of the moon, to a machine that maliciously distracts people while giving a selected few the power of watching over them with ever changing objectives as to why they watch them.

Windows, like few others, eased people into thinking that that was the right way to use a computer all along.

That is why I hate it.

I love that "the price is right" for "best features are MIA". Also, the wikipedia article is funny.

Do the uninformed people that just see the design and promise deserve to be scammed? Even if the only reason might be to not further enable the scammer, the scammed people don't deserve their fate.

I say all this but I still cannot comprehend how someone would buy this.

I mean, everyone is responsible for their own choices. I don't think they deserve to be scammed, that sounds a bit predatory.

They do need to learn their lesson and suffer consequences, however minor, but they don't deserve to be scammed.

The scammer should be punished. Harshly.

Else we wind up in a world where a scam is the only, or at least most prominent, way. As seen with The Cloud, subscription based streaming and "buying", "smart" devices and so on.

Have to test it but guides suggest that it's possible

Oh, I still use Teamspeak! It's very nice for small groups up to 32 people (after that one has to use the paid tiers). I do not use X though.

Maybe I'll give Mumble a shot, so I can integrate it with Matrix/Synapse/Element.

Ah, well, same spiel though. Also, fuck Denuvo.

They already are throwing punches because they noticed people being less gullible than them. I'm guessing this would result in a "double down", like "The developers wouldn't have to kill this game if the pirates would have bought it."

So the unobserved quantum states observe the observer? Every one of them, all the time? I KNEW I wasn't crazy!

Very nice, thank you!

I too would love the dotfiles. Or at least a pointer for the slanted edges. I tried linear-gradient, but I just can't get this right. I use waybar for this, so I might not be able to reproduce this, but I'll try anyway.