RT Redréovič

I agree with and am aware of many things you wrote.

I have to disagree with your assessment comrade, if white rice were not reinforced (thankfully this is done by using the ground up husk of the rice grain they just broke up) and you ate it everyday, you would certainly have vitamin deficiencies, potentially lethally so. Is this considered healthy? It's the same problem as eating lean meat, it can be lethal if you rely on it too much and people should know this is a risk.

Yes, that is why I said a Balanced diet should be vouched for. Adding more, a well researched and analyzed balanced diet that, as I said, is according to the physical requirements of the person.

As someone who lives in India, the society here is dominated by Brahmanvadi culture and they force highly carbohydrate rich diets on their people, this leads to malnutrition if other nutrients are not supplied in case of most of the lower class and caste families and fattening in case of more well off families. My family comes in the second group and I have been trying to combat this error in our lifestyle however my parents are very resilient to that change towards a more scientific approach. They simply do not look at food through a scientific lens which is implied considering they are religious.

Rice is a daily staple food in many parts of the world; I agree that people should diversify their diet, but this is easier said than done! (And I'm definitely not the most diverse eater). Replacing white rice with more whole rice, and doing the same with flour, is a simple switch that is more healthy.

Well yes, there are definitely financial and distributory constraints. Taking India as an example where 80 Crore people out of 130 Crore are food insecure and rely on the government to procure grains, only grains. Their diets are quite restrictive and it is evident in their physique. I was speaking more or less with the assumption that the reader can afford to be able to make necessary changes to their diet. Considering they are on lemmy afterall.

Healthy encompasses more than something being non-toxic, I take a very analytical approach and essentially place a healthy diet as something that hits your recommended nutrient quotas.

Yes, that is what a balanced diet is.

Junk food uses the trifecta of sugar, salt and fat to become pleasing and potentially addictive. 5g of salt a day is the maximum recommended amount, but most people consume more than that -- a Whopper at Burger King contains 9 grams of salt. It's also the calories and the feeling of fullness; many people (it doesn't seem to affect everyone) report still feeling hungry after eating fast food or junk food which encourages them to eat something more. The whopper I mentioned contains 678 calories already (just the simplest whopper with no cheese), where most people need ~2k every day

Yes, to maximize their profits, Food Corporations use these methods. The consumption can still be limited and neutralized by exercise of course. Of course it is not recommended to introduce regular consumption of Fast Food to diet but that one occasional treat won't do much harm. You only have one life afterall.

So for example, I have cut out all added sugar in my food and substituted them with Stevia or Sucralose only when necessary, usually milk or Coffee. I also try to self serve so that I take only as much as I require. Because as a student, I really do not need too many calories.

Reducing your carb intake is actually healthy, as high-carb diets are a driver of type 2 diabetes. Fibres (a type of carbs) are also very important, and white rice has almost none whereas parboiled rice has 4 times the contents.

I am wary, yes.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

There is no good rice or bad rice nor is there any healthy or unhealthy food, this is a very old and rather vague concept. If a person is focused on good health then a good and balanced diet should be vouched for instead. If something is edible and has no toxic effect then it is food, the nutritional requirements chart after that needs to be analyzed according to one's physical needs and planned. You can consume 'junk food' as well but that requires you to balance your overall diet by making up for that extra fat you consumed, that is if you are actually focused on good health.

Like you said, if White Rice has more Carbohydrates while other Rice types have less Carbohydrates and more proteins then choose any but balance the diet accordingly. So for example if you choose White Rice then make up for the lost protein by eating foods containing protein, likewise if you choose wild rice then make up for the lost carbohydrates by eating other foods. And of course then there are other Nutrients as well.

The entire objective is to obtain nutrients, however way you do.

True. Feeder is a great app. Every morning, I wake up and have my coffee while reading my news feed via Feeder.

Looks nice. I used to have a Solarized Dark Rice an year ago when I used Artix.

I really do not see any logical basis that makes you separate privacy friendliness from User Friendliness. If a platform wishes to be user friendly, privacy is also one of the fundamental rights of a user the platform needs to take care of for it to be considered friendly to a user.

The fact that a lot of people, not 'everybody', are comfortable with Instagram has no strong points to consolidate your own position. It only describes how good the horrible marketting of Giant Tech Corporations is at entrapping millions of people into using it, generating life long addictions and the eventual wastage of time on removed culture. While the Corporations collect all that data available to them to further their own Capitalist interests.

Privacy does come at a cost and compromise. A slightly less funkier UI for a far more secure platform, for essentially 0 cost is a lot one could ask for, especially when you are comparing a Libre project made by a small organization to a proprietary project made by a Multi Billionaire MNC.

I will not be apologetic in saying that you are the child here who is tailing the mass of consumers without proper analysis.

It is ironic that you call a Proprietary Data Harvester Platform User "Friendly". Well forget users. Meta even collects data of non users to top off the grimness.

Surprised Void Linux has not been recommended. I suggest giving it a try.