The problem with that remains: who decides what is and isn't allowed? The government? This idea seems great until it falls in the hands of say, a government led by Trump.
The problem with that remains: who decides what is and isn't allowed? The government? This idea seems great until it falls in the hands of say, a government led by Trump.
At first glance I read this as "defecation" and in my mind it's all such a shitshow that it didn't even register as exceptionally odd that the shitshow might've turned literal.
And it's the 70's so the pack-and-a-half of smokes per day is implied.
What happened in those years and why were they omitted? It's odd that they just leave it out with (as far as I could tell from the linked source) no explanation for that.
Wouldn't repeated patterns of gibberish be worse for machine learning than just sheer randomness? I have absolutely no knowledge about machine learning but I'm imagining it learns from patterns and largely ignores randomness because it simply can't parse that.
Had to Google it too. It's the woman that got shot on January 6th 2021 in the Capitol.
The subject is US news. The government isn't communist and there's no indication that it will be any time soon. If there was to be a great firewall of any kind then it's obvious that the government is going to be the one to control it. My point was that that's a problem.