• 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 30th, 2023

help-circle

  • Damn fine work all around.

    I know this is an issue fraught with potential legal and political BS, and it's impossible to check everything without automation these days, but is there an organization that trains and pays people to work as security researchers or QA for open source projects?

    Basically, a watchdog group that finds exploitable security vulnerabilities, and works with individuals or vendors to patch them? Maybe make it a publicly owned and operated group with mandatory reporting of some kind. An international project funded by multiple governments, where it's harder for a single point of influence to hide exploits, abuse secrets, or interfere with the researchers? They don't own or control any code, just find security issues and advise.

    I don't know.

    Just thinking that modern security is getting pretty complicated, with so many moving parts and all.




  • They all work well enough on my weak machine with an RX580.

    Buuuuuuuuuut, RWKY had some kind of optimization thing going that makes it two or three times faster to generate output. The problem is that you have to be more aware of the order of your input. It has a hard time going backwards to a previous sentence, for example.

    So you'd want to say things like "In the next sentence, identify the subject." and not "Identify the subject in the previous text."




  • At my last job, the fire system kept calling the fire department with false positives so often that they told us to fix it or the city was going to start fining the company LOTS of money. One of the dumbass HR people asked if we could just disable the fire system to prevent it from making false positives. The very patient fireman had to explain that no, we could not intentionally disable fire safety equipment in a populated building, and the company had to actually fix the broken detector.

    The elevators also broke down a lot, one time with my intern inside. I called the fire department to get her out, and my boss's boss said I should have waited longer before calling the fire department, for some reason. I forget why.

    I never signed an NDA, and I think I'd be fine telling you the name of this global company. But to be safe, I won't. I'll just say that most of the people here have probably interacted with customer service run by this company before. I AM CERTAIN OF IT.




  • Wes_Dev@lemmy.mltoGaming@lemmy.mlSteam Code Giveaway
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Oh, this is so nice. Thank you!

    Your post says to message you? Will do.

    Most of the stuff is already gone, but Alekon looks adorable. Reminds me a bit of Slime Rancher graphics with Pokemon Snap gameplay.

    UPDATE: I got the code for the game and have played it for about 10 hours. It's very cute, and the mental break from daily stress that I needed. Thank you again @EssentialCoffee@midwest.social






  • Huh, that's an interesting point that I never thought of before.

    Do you think there would be a way to make them easier to differentiate that would make them more useful, or do you think there's a fundamental problem with using them?

    I'm thinking of workarounds like making emoji SVG to scale to whatever size you need.

    Or maybe an optional setting to insert text after an emoji for users that want it. Example:

    😊 (Smiling face)

    What do you think?


  • The article is misusing the word sceptic here, which is a pet peeve of mine. That language indirectly contributes to a lack of respect for actual experts and a sense of "there is no objective truth" BS.

    Skepticism is not blindly denying things. That would be more akin to cynicism, or well, denialism. You can't be a "climate change skeptic", any more than you can be a "round earth skeptic", or a "gravity skeptic".

    Skepticism is about being willing to update or disregard beliefs that do not match the evidence. It's about determining what is or isn't high quality evidence, and letting your ideas be challenged and tested, as only the things most likely to be true will survive. It's a process for how you approach new information, deeply held beliefs, your own assumptions, and the claims of others. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than anything else we've got.

    And unfortunately for "climate change skeptics", that also means we can know with fairly high confidence, the truth of certain things. Climate science and climate change are some of the things we have very strong evidence for, and to be "skeptical" of them in this day is not critical thinking. It's either lying, political posturing, or burying your head in the sand.