Wordplay [he/him]

  • 8 Posts
  • 130 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 15th, 2020

help-circle



  • Thank you for your response!

    What I meant was that their analysis felt like it complicated traditionally marxist positions, eschewing the deterministic trajectory of history (not a bad thing) and being concerned more with the characteristics of individual freedom within early societies rather than more causal 'class-like' elements that constrain or enable that freedom. While their problematization of centralized hierarchical states does seem to echo the more utopian visions of a post-socialist, communist society, in our given time and in the context of problems of a global scale, it seems appropriate to be skeptical when these past observations start to turn into present prescriptions for adopting 'flexible and creative' forms of organization that have, in the last century, been ineffective at challenging power or ushering in meaningful and lasting alternatives. If you do have a chance to read it, though, I would recommend it.













  • Always bring a steward.

    HR's first impulse when receiving a serious sexual harassment complaint from my coworker was to reframe everything my coworker said in the most downplayed way. Like a, "oh shit this is serious. . . how do I get this employee to make it sound like it wasn't a big deal". Inhuman Resources indeed.





  • I thought this was a strong departure from the last two underwhelming episodes. It also engaged with the whole ethics of shifting timelines better than the Orville episode did. I'd still kill Khan though.. SNW's stance is basically don't kill Hitler if you have the chance.


  • It's funny, I had a completely opposite reaction. A prejudiced legal system can be overcome simply through impassioned speeches appealing to the humanity of the judges within that system? Pursuing 'salvation' through self-sacrifice motivated by personal discomfort or self-interest? Requesting asylum from the very political body that you require asylum from? Activist lawyer comes off as problematic for using a wider perspective on the oppressive history of Starfleet-Illyrian relations at the expense of her client's legal prospects? Skirting the messiness of a eugenic society and essentially sidestepping the paradox of intolerance by siding with the position that we have to be tolerant of the intolerant? I thought the episode was pure unexamined liberalism.

    I'm happy to see the light though