_aj42 [none/use name]

How does that screenshot show support of imperialist wars?

I'm well aware of the problems of religious extremism, I just don't believe that putting people you suspect of having sympathies to extremist groups in internment camps to be an appropriate form of combatting it. Rehabilitation programs should certainly be used and I'd definitely support de-radicalisation efforts (e.g messaging) in local communities, but what China actually seems to be doing (taking people they assume might have sympathies to put them in camps against their will) is just indefensible to me. If you're ok with that, fine, we evidently have different values, but I don't think we can pretend this is the only way of going about this here, and there is good reason why other nations with similar issues have not taken the same approach (granted these aren't perfect but you get the picture).

I don't think this particularly answers the question though, or at least what I think it's asking. It's about why a party nominally committed to achieving communism is keen to implement sexuality-based hierarchies, not whether the population as a whole is homophobic (though I see why that is obviously relevant)

I feel like there's room for nuance between doing whatever the fuck the US did and putting Muslims in camps

Would you say the same about Muslims in Germany? Do you think Germany should be putting all the Muslims in camps?

And why should what western countries do make a difference? Are they the epitome of virtue now?

Also, you're literally engaging in right wing talking points when you describe all the Muslims in the province as terrorists or terrorist sympathisers

Can't believe 'ISIS existed so we have to put all these Muslims in camps' is an actual take

Would 'ISIS' be an acceptable excuse if like, Germany started mass imprisoning Muslims?

E.g me, who until I read that comment thought I knew what dialectical materialism is. How does it safeguard us from isolation and echo chambers?