Thank you all for the informative answers, I think I'll go for some of the quicker glueless methods and bind the longer books by chapter. Maybe I'll post results, sufficient or bad. >glueless

Oh yeah the question about printing: is it weird, sus and noticeable when I use the printer to print hella pages from a pdf straight from librarygeniuses.ru (or .fun)

Yes. Why would my philosophical beliefs be independent of my personality? It would be quite jarring to see someone like, idk, Bernie Sanders expressing raging nietzscheanism.

There probably is a connection between philosophy and personality, but that doesn't occur in a void; as with any other literature, media, idea, it will be something which you experience and that will affect you.

Personality might dictate your search for certain literature, make you prefer one reading over another, or perhaps interpret in the only way you find possible

Also, Diogenes the Cynic is just this surefire way to show you don't know philosophy. He's kind of that filter that shows that "the person I'm talking to knows philosophy through memes". A bit like Machiavelli for some decades ago - "the person I'm talking to knows philosophy through manipulative self help books". Sorry Diogenes-lovers, u need to up your habitus

Don't let the label leftist stop you from reading theory deemed not leftist. Even people like Carl Schmitt are still relevant.

Don't laugh this must be very distressing for mr. Bolsonaro he might die of hiccups. don't laugh and don't imagine him doing hiccups like Donald Duck would.

we are rapidly approaching the day the sigma variant drops

I hate the fact that people pretend to be for or against CRT. CRT is almost completely irrelevant to the discussions of what seems to mostly be corporate liberal DiAngelo racism. It's only there as a buzzword, a boogeyman. I want everyone to just reject that bullshit because CRT isn't that. DiAngelo bullshit is stupid and not representative of CRT, nor is it representative of antiracism. So leftists and libs defend the shit conservatives attack as CRT (DiAngelo bullshit) because they believe CRT is antiracism in general. Reject conservative boogeymen. Anyone that says "CRT" in a discussion should be dismissed and CBT'd.

sucks that /r/CT's quality is gonna get fucked because of that. All communties are better when under the radar

I'd say avoid starting with Hanabi and watch one of his earlier works first. Maybe Violent Cop?

ok but wtf do u people do when pages are stuck??? sweaty hand ass motherfuckers

I mean they're spending money astroturfing on reddit and establishing in nerd places. I'm sure there are cheaper brands.

deleted by creator

Saw that "no name" brand bullshit things being astroturfed on reddit. It's so stupid. They're selling a product supposedly without identity yet the brand attempts to distinguish itself through this lack of identity. The characteristic colours. The descriptive label. The brand name is typed "no name" with a ®. Their products are distinctively theirs. So the brand has a concrete identity despite claiming the opposite. It isn't the rejection of products that sell more things than just products (the rejection of products involving identity). It is instead selling the identity of being a person that rejects products that sell more things than just products. Why would you buy this? Because they lack a name, and just sell products. But even this product contains a bullshit identity. And the identity the products attempt to construct is attacked by the product itself.
People easily become aware and repulsed by brands selling identities. It's obvious that the countercultural rejection of consumerism in the end gets commodified, but I didn't imagine it would ever be so nauseatingly obvious. The only no name I respect is Noname.

It's really just a boogeyman, isn't it? I don't think I know anyone who has interacted with what is considered CRT. CRT is part of the many critical theories surrounding race and it'd be wrong to generalize it as "most theory surrounding race" which is how I've seen it interpreted by some libs, cons and leftists. It's a silly boogeyman and it shouldn't be brought up as actually representing leftism and race, but for some reason leftists suddenly want to pick this up because of this boogeymanning. At least Habermas had influence before becoming the conservative boogeyman.

I recall some event being mentioned but I can't remember exactly what it was. The hesitancy was there already by the swine flu IIRC.

It's not some kind of antivaxx movement but it's just general hesitation to vaccinations in a non-conspiratory way.

uhuh sounds like you got a worse score than her

haha how about he starts “vaushing” himself more haha

Kind of blue