This sounds so proficient, the insight is appreciated! Currently I've been using the note to self in signal and it's a jumbled mess. I haven't put much thought about properly organizing this stuff yet. Y'alls posts def sparked ideas.
I just found gitjournal (I was looking mobile apps to push mdx to git). Do you recommend this, or would you recommend something else?
EDIT: Just gonna give it a try it looks open source
Thank you for the useful info. I'm not too proficient with github, but will look more into this!
If you’re terminally online you’ll identify this as Hegelian/arboreal as opposed to Deleuzian/rhizomal, which has the effect of centralizing power in the platform rather than the content.
I never thought about it that way. Interesting!
https://hexbear.net/post/179501
Important points I gathered from that post:
How would this work? Basically a curated MDX file where you can see changes in it's commit history? Until now I've used https://prolewiki.org/ which not always has pages to topics, but this sounds like I'd be able to personalize it? Do you (or anyone) have tips on how to organize such list (Topics, People, generally how and which tags to use?) ?
This is definitely a huge downside. What also about additionally to the technical solutions for spam detection you mentioned, designing it to be more as a general guide for understanding as opposed to a definite copypaste rebuttal, meaning a ressouce (Link, Book whatever) with a community sourced disclaimer why that resource holds a lot of meaning:
e.g.: ressource: https://www.rferl.org/a/putin-s-a-solid-man-declassified-memos-offer-window-into-yeltsin-clinton-relationship/29462317.html
archive link: [archive links]
Importance: RFE is fully funded by the US Government. In the context of the question if NATO was still necessary after the disolution SU, this ressource supports the narrative that... etc.[Community sourced]
related ressources: [community sourced]
Or would that lead to copypasting nonetheless? I think I saw chuds doing something similar or as wiki where they had a ressource with strawmanned leftist arguments and had hottake answers as rebuttals and linked to in debate bro culture which would probably be good to avoid lol
I'm just spitballin here because I'm excited about the general idea
:arm-L: :xinternet: :arm-R:
I love when geopolitcally themed posts gain traction in c/news. The discussions are :stalin-heart:
I feel like the more "businessy" sounding like you'd find with bloomberg, wjs, etc. , the "truer" the info is. They are just using statements/facts without justifying themselves ideologically too much and speak directly to the ruling class. I think someone here commented before that Chomsky talks about this and I've been trying read stuff with this in mind. :chomsky-yes-honey:
I remember him directly talking to the chud audience and directing them away from Peterson. While Peterson was preparing for the debate by only reading the communist manifesto, zizek took a nice long shit on capitalism. Zizek also called Peterson out by asking him to directly show him the cultural Marxists, which he obviously couldn't
Overall it was decent in the debatebro framework, but still like all debate bro shit worthless? Idk
I love how well you have it organized wtf! Thank you so much for the links, I will probably PM you sometime soon if you dont mind! :stalin-heart: