minaret [he/him]

the mods are ok but goddamn these posts have "respect the thin blue line" energy like a mf

Are there receipts for the SA or transphobia reasons?

I remember a tweet she made causing problems veeery early on resulting in her being removed as admin. Is that what you're referring to?

In particular, I had not heard about the SA thing and would appreciate knowing what was done.

Finally, assuming these are both true, is there a restorative justice path here in which mediation and self-crit can work to offset the harm she caused and help her be a better comrade?

edit: Looks like cuttlefish posted some elsewhere. My last question still stands.

I think it's mostly talking about struggling with addiction and housing situations.

As far as op sec goes, there was never any actual credible threat to her, and it's been enough time without any further harassment that it seems pointless to keep her out for those reasons.

She's not exactly hard to spot and historically the admins have rebanned her whenever it becomes clear its her.

Fuckhaha, Rachel is banned because she is Blair White style transphobic / truscummy

What are you referring to? She's, in her words, "trans femme with fucking facial hair" and constantly struggles against truscum trying to invalidate her.

mods have a britney spears style arrangement in which she's not allowed to post for her own safety, as she has previously been doxxed and they are concerned she will be further harassed

as the person who originally provided the proof she was hacked, i'm pretty sorry to see it. i hope they reconsider.

it's actually pretty unnerving.

"i didn't connect with it" is not "a critique"

the closest OP came to a critique was "I had an issue with a lot of the dated understanding of sexuality, gender, and terminology for both of those aspects of human indentity" out of 642 words.

OP never elaborated either other than to further complain about "a dogmatic turn", so this really does feel like a thinly veiled excuse to criticize the administration of the book club

that's a shit ton of wordswordswords to tone police how the book was recommended, but you never actually critiqued the book itself except to call it "outdated"

i am unimpressed. but i will look into the alternate suggestions you made

just look at this thread and you have your answer

a lot of people are not capable of really going beyond "there was sex!@!!" when talking about it

I recognize that user. They're almost certainly either a fedposter or stupid enough to be doing the feds work for free.

The other day they were accusing everyone left and right that Signal and its creator were US assets and that they shouldn't be used. Classic snitchjacketing with the outcome of tricking people into not using well vetted open source privacy tools.

Just checked the modlog and someone was banned for being "anti-religion" what in the heck

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

yeah i'm aware but i lurk on some pretty unsavory discords out of curiosity and i literally saw them plan that post and share her dox

I also have the password the hacker changed hers to if you want a bit of evidence that it was hacked

deleted by creator

Admins, I am visiting from another community and have some corroborating evidence that her login was compromised and can probably correlate some pieces of it. DM me if you want to chat

edit: for a quick bit of corroborating evidence, the picture was taken from an old r/stims post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Stims/comments/4onq5u/the_feeling_of_picking_up_a_fresh_g/

lmk if you want more proof/info