I don't even mean a bad thing, necessarily. I mean a thing that is made to normalize the status quo, pave over inherent contradictions in late stage neoliberal capitalism, make even the idea of changing society somewhat seem evil or impossible, and have lots of performative gestures that hide the stench of affluent arrogance. :zizek-preference:
I know it came out well before 2020, but I finally got around to seeing Iron Man 2 and I stopped at the instant Tony Stark said "I've successfully privatized world peace." It was bad. Very bad. The original movie was entertaining even if it had some painful deliberate adjustments to the comic book character to make him more like :my-hero: but the sequel played out like Ayn Rand fanfiction, especially the big smart awesome genius giving a speech about how the evil government and the ungrateful moochers were taking the sweat from his brow and so on and so on. :zizek:
The flood of MCU movies wore me out to the point that I stopped watching them and because of that I have only seen maybe half of them by now. Maybe it was a mistake returning to try watching Iron Man 2 because I now have even less interest in seeing anything MCU ever again. :zizek-fuck:
V for Vendetta.
A government uses a false flag pandemic to consolidate power through provision of a vaccine. A single person in a Guy Fawkes mask wins the populace over with atrociously verbose wordplay and domestic terrorism. He also wins the girl over to his ideology by kidnapping and torturing her.
It’s less lib and more outright reactionary, but whatever.
The writer of V for Vendetta Alan Moore is literally a communist space wizard which makes this quite a funny one. The point of that story is really supposed to be a superhero doing revolution against British fascism. Of course the whole 1 person thing is a problem but that's always going to be a problem doing a superhero style graphic novel, but the overall premise beyond that is just revolution and not moralising about it.
Moore disowned the movie, saying it was Liberal performative whining about 2000s-era Neo-cons
The graphic novel presents V as way more ambiguous morally
Yeah, also even if V is still the instigator in the novel, a lot of the chaos and unraveling of the fascist state is because of the different parts of it manouvering against each other and trying to seize power, V is only tangentially involved in killing the head of state, he's just assassinated by a relatively random woman who has been victimized by the system.
Also the aftermath is shown as having very harsh effects on people even if its good that the fascist state has collapsed, one of the last things we see is a woman being forced into selling herself for food cause all of hers was stolen, which might be intended as a kind of karmic thing cause the woman was one of the main political schemers in the fascist state but its still fucked up and something that would happen if the state collapses with no real structure or organization to follow it. Contrast that to the movie which just kinda ends in a peaceful demonstration and the fascist soldiers refusing to gun down a crowd.
also why do people think guy fawkes was a freedom fighter that's just not true
i think people mostly arent aware of the whole catholic monarchist chud aspect
and its just easy for people to empathise with a dude who wants to blow up the british parliament, its relatable yknow
It's not that he was a freedom fighter. It's that a conspiracy of like eight guys almost overthrew a poweful nation. It's a demonstration that even the most towering and monolithic entities are still vulnerable, and that highly motivated individuals can in fact change the world.
Obligatory: I would sell my own mother into slavery to see the movie V for Vendetta 2 :zizek:
Where would we be without him?