One part Great Man Theory with tons of navel gazing and genuflecting to a handful of star figures. One part Sorkin-esque courtroom drama.

Zero parts fun.

Three fucking hours long.

Don't waste your money on this shit bag, folks.

  • newmou [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it’s a commentary of the maturity of the treats. I think it’s going out of your way to say that there is zero value or anything interesting in a movie like Oppenheimer is just reductive and silly. It just speaks to having a pretty unrefined sense of film analysis. Notice here I’m not arguing for the merits of Oppenheimer. There’s often a sort of weird desire to compete with one another in left spaces to be more radical than others, like “oh that’s your opinion? My opinion is even more extreme than that. I win.” Which leaks into conversations like this in weird ways, and I think that’s a generally a of personal immaturity, not the maturity of the thing itself. And also, “baby brained” is just colloquial shorthand. It’s a silly little phrase, but it’s kind of straw man to be like “oh you used a widespread internet phrase, who’s the immature one now?”

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • newmou [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        What would the “unless” part of that be? It was tongue in cheek

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • newmou [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s obvious. I’m asking you what you’re implying with the “unless” because their comment doesn’t extend beyond just being tongue in cheek. If you’re tired, we can leave it. Honestly none of this matters