The rhetoric and goal of Hexbar are clear based on their announcement: to “dismantle western propaganda” and "demolish organizations such as NATO” shows that Hexbar has no intention of "respecting the rules of the community instance in which they are posting/commenting.” It’s to push their beliefs and ideology.

lol. lmao even

  • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Lmao, my favorite reply must be the one talking about "muh echo chambers bad" while supporting defederating anything they don't want to hear

    The liberal brain is a sight to behold

    • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]M
      ·
      11 months ago

      Like, we literally don't want to be an echo chamber. We didn't CHOOSE to leave Reddit. We CHOSE a federated social media platform with the intent of communicating with other communities. This got derailed for a few years for historical reasons, but the intent was there in the beginning and it is finally being followed through on.

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, the hypocrisy/doublethink/whatever you want to call it is mindnumbing lol

          • take_five_seconds [he/him, any]
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            post the quote nerd

            edit: sorry couldn't find it then i scrolled down half a page and someone else posted it so i might as well be another nerd that posts it

            During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

            If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

      • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
        ·
        11 months ago

        if having well-defined ideological boundaries is being an echo chamber, I'm honestly okay with it. let libs have every other site. I put in my hours trying to get ideas through their thick skulls years ago on reddit-logo.

        • M68040 [they/them]
          ·
          11 months ago

          Like, that whole “echo chamber” line always seemed like it was mostly just used to justify republicans being allowed to be dumbasses in the public square. Dumb as shit