Looks like we upset a few too many kkkanada residents over at lemmy.ca. I didn't see a post about this on here, so I thought I'd go ahead and make one.

2 of 4 reasons why are basically just PPB lol, and a third is for calling for executions of landlords mao-aggro-shining

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Step 1: Execute landlords

    Step 2: Land doesn’t actually get properly distributed and a new landlord rises

    Step 3: ???

    Step 4: Profit?

    (Step 5: Revolution all over again)

    Edit: /s in case it’s not clear. sigh Poe’s Law sucks 🤦‍♂️

    Uhh excuse me I'm sorry what was step 2 again??

      • emizeko [they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        they also purposefully obscure and ignore the distinction between personal property (held for use) and private property (held for profit)

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In my experience, it has genuinely not occurred to most liberals that those are different things, but then when presented with the distinction they pretend not to have heard it.

          • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            My experience is that liberals, upon hearing the difference, will start conflating the two. Like they'll say their house is both personal and private, since they intend to use it as an investment.

            What a miserable way to see housing

    • Bruja [she/her, love/loves]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry.