Looks like we upset a few too many kkkanada residents over at lemmy.ca. I didn't see a post about this on here, so I thought I'd go ahead and make one.

2 of 4 reasons why are basically just PPB lol, and a third is for calling for executions of landlords mao-aggro-shining

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      that actually sound well-written if you disregard the fact that China is an oppressive regime

      Translation; "I don't know how to counter these arguments, so I'll just assume its propaganda and move on"

        • VILenin [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          a liberal’s thought process consists of inventing a conclusion and selectively interpreting evidence

          • Parenti Bot@lemmygrad.mlB
            ·
            1 year ago
            The quote

            In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the Cold War, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

            -- Michael Parenti, Blackshirts And Reds

            I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the admins of this instance if you have any questions or concerns.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Good bot. I am glad to see that our robotic comrades are joining us in the struggle. rosa-salute

    • Rom [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arguments I agree with = well-thought-out

      Arguments I disagree with = Chinese propaganda

        • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          "Whew, those dastardly communists almost had me there with that instructive and enlightening argument. Thankfully my hegemonic capitalist programming FACTS AND LOGIC kicked in and I rejected their arguments immediately without further thought."

          How do they not realize what an incredible self-own that shit is lmao

          • VILenin [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            “I have come to a predetermined conclusion and will not change my mind no matter the evidence because China is inherently bad (totally not racist btw)”

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      that actually sound well-written if you disregard the fact that China is an oppressive regime

      Holeeeeeeeee shit.

    • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      while the other half parrots more Chinese propaganda (that actually sound well-written if you disregard the fact that China is an oppressive regime).

      Under liberalism, there are no good or bad actions, only good and bad teams theory-gary

    • TheCaconym [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      half of them replies with huge and ugly emojis

      Our emojis may be huge due to the lemmy bug (I've been trying to refrain posting some outside of the instance due to that), but ugly ?!

      How dare them, we have the best emojis

    • Rojo27 [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me: Mom I want expertise on China.

      Mom: We've already got a China expert at home.

      The China expert at home:zenz

    • SnAgCu [he/him, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      50% of posts are well-written arguments? Not a bad ratio, frankly. Good posts, guys.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like all leftists we're pathetically vulnerable to engaging in lively debate about economics.

  • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TLDR: if you want to know if an instance will defed hexbear, check its instance block list for lemmygrad.

    been making stray comments here and there about this, I'm telling y'all if an instance defeds lemmygrad it is 1000% going to defed hexbear, we're calmer and more solitary than y'all, so all the accusations of trolling or brigading or just generally being "ebil tankies" against the grad can and will be used against hexbear too. I fully expect .world to defed lemmygrad in the next couple months too once they're finally got their shit under control. Is what it is, hopefully normal users still manage to find us and switch to instances that aren't ran by anticommunists.

    • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. I was surprised to find that they were even federated with hexbear. Lemmy.ca was on my shortlist of instances to join when I was moving to Lemmy. Blocking lemmygrad was reason enough to find a different instance.

    • Odo [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like we sometimes overstate the we are calmer/polite/respectful part. There was a hexbear user telling another hexbear user that our emojis in federated communities were a little disruptive (because they are really big) and they apologized, but another user replied to them with a ppb lol

    • JuneFall [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do see that lemmygrad is more aligned to some ML types, while hexbear is a bit wider, which does make for a difference. But it doesn't seem the strain of communism is the main problem for the de-federating people.

      However we have a more diverse set of opinions in our user base, since we don't ban people that quick (i.e. in terms of war in Russia we have some revolutionary defeatists, some anti imperialists who favour a weakening of the imperialist NATO (which really irks other instance admins, etc.).

      To moderate a sub sub sub comment of a main thread is a bit funny though.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I saw that thread last night, I was expecting the links to the "offenses" to be wild. But then it was just bathroom humor, and a singular call to execute landlords, which I found hilarious.

    I just do not understand the lack of humor of a lot of people, on these instances. You'd swear their lives are devoid of happiness.

    • TheCaconym [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A lot of those are pretexts for defederating I think

      What rubs them the wrong way is our position on various issues (despite them being far more deeply argued and sourced than the paltry answers we usually get)

      Also, admittedly and to a lesser degree, likely the fact we're numerous and terminally online so anytime something dunkable is posted even the small subset of online hexbear users that see it appear on their feed and interact must look like an army to them

    • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guaranteed most of them have some interesting opinions on the indigenous people of Canada and how they ended up in their current situation.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Step 1: Execute landlords

      Step 2: Land doesn’t actually get properly distributed and a new landlord rises

      Step 3: ???

      Step 4: Profit?

      (Step 5: Revolution all over again)

      Edit: /s in case it’s not clear. sigh Poe’s Law sucks 🤦‍♂️

      Uhh excuse me I'm sorry what was step 2 again??

        • emizeko [they/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          they also purposefully obscure and ignore the distinction between personal property (held for use) and private property (held for profit)

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In my experience, it has genuinely not occurred to most liberals that those are different things, but then when presented with the distinction they pretend not to have heard it.

            • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              My experience is that liberals, upon hearing the difference, will start conflating the two. Like they'll say their house is both personal and private, since they intend to use it as an investment.

              What a miserable way to see housing

      • Bruja [she/her, love/loves]
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry.

  • jackmarxist [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Calls China an Oppressive Regime

    Based in country that swore fealty to a pedophile enabling racist royal family which leeches off the people of the UK and imprisons people standing against monarchy.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UK complaining about China is really rich given the way their courts work, their actual literal king and unelected house of parliament, ASBOs, and the UK being far and away the most exhaustively surveilled country in the world.

      • uralsolo
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

  • robinn2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole point is that whoever you're replying to has descended in to silly chud shit and there's no longer any point engaging with their "ideas", but apparently our refined linguistic achievements are too complex.

  • RNAi [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Calling for exections of landlords

    liberty-weeping

      • RNAi [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aight give me your take on the Falklands War

          • RNAi [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, agree.

            The only thing that irks me is that there's only 6k britbongs living in those islands, and feels like rule-of-thumb kicking britbongs back to the UK always seem like the correct thing to do. But yes, they live there.

    • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      they literally have 0 concept of the procession of history, and how the founding of your country less than 200 fucking years ago very much does matter to the present day???

      • Bloobish [comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        "Moralists don't really have beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child's toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded. Centrism isn't change -- not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth."

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are so many treaty conflicts going on in Canada right now. O KKKlanada!

    • JuneFall [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It gets even better, look at that dudes profile: https://lemmy.ca/u/MapleEngineer

      @MapleEngineer

      25 years in the federal government in guns and badges, 22 of those in Corrections, then 10 years in hacker hunting and breach detection, now an information security sales engineer. Homestead farmer, amateur welder, equipment operator, electronic designer, 40 years soldering, husband and father.

      142 Posts 529 Comments, Joined: June 14th, 2023

      Also got a youtube channel

      With a fun quote:

      garbage cheap chinese breadboard for $1 I use as solder fixture

      my good breadboard is $10 it is much better.

        • JuneFall [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, he is. The other high upvoted poster I linked to is in the military. So a prison guard and a soldier were among the two loudest voices to have Hexbear banned.

          acab-3

      • oregoncom [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who the fuck is talking about breadboard quality. The whole point is that it's cheap and temporary. Also the "good breadboard" is 100% also Chinese. Plus he sucks at soldering, he uses too much solder so all the joints are balling up. It's supposed to be concave and shiny.

        • JuneFall [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          concave

          https://arquidiamantina.org/it/how-to-better-identify-a-cold-solder-joint/

          Image showing what you mean by that.

  • Rojo27 [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lmao @ the "not all landlords are bad" comments.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all landlords are bad, but all people under 30 can't afford to live in Canadian citys. soviet-hmm

      • Rojo27 [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It's almost as if landlordism requires participating in a system of exploitation no matter how "nice" the individual may besoviet-hmm

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Idiots falling for that lazy argument still.

      Somewhat like cops, not every individual is an evil, Machiavellian monster harboring Hitlerian-esque notions of governance and law. However, their existence continues to perpetuate a (horrific) status quo, AND NOBODY IS BORN A COP OR LANDLORD.

      Don't like being called a parasitic bastard? Quit then fucker lmao

  • uralsolo
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      We're totally denying any validity to their position with a vulgar and grotesque reply. It's about as rude as you can get, which is no less than most of them deserve.

    • JuneFall [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the one thing the admins of those instances could really enforce, just ban people for usage of it and be done with it, but no instead ban 20k people.

  • betelgeuse [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Adding to the discussion = spending hours arguing with me over my basic misunderstanding of the world until I declare victory by citing The Economist and calling you a tankie

    • Grimble [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      And dragging on an argument one point at a time, completely disconnected from the pace of the thread, because I only have like 3 arguments that are all memorized slogans, and have to space them out for dramatic effect