My post got banned for being "wrecker behaviour". I don't know the community here, I joined because people said Hexbear is trans friendly, can someone explain the terminology? Google has other people using the word but nobody explaining it
My post got banned for being "wrecker behaviour". I don't know the community here, I joined because people said Hexbear is trans friendly, can someone explain the terminology? Google has other people using the word but nobody explaining it
Ah. So, suppose we lived in a sexist society where oppression of women was normal, and not seen as a problem, as divisive, or as a dispute by most people. In this hypothetical society, if a woman were to say "misogyny is bad", and to be perceived as sowing division and starting disputes, then would she be considered a wrecker?
deleted by creator
I mean what if she said that as a member of society? Like at her job, or at the christmas family dinner? Would she be a wrecker? What if the mainstream left and the mainstream right in her society were both misogynist and there weren't any non-misogynist spaces anywhere?
deleted by creator
So you're saying that if society in its entirety is hostile and oppressive to a minority, then existing as a member of that minority and demanding rights isn't wrecking?
How would a minority go about defending themself if they were accused of wrecking for being oppressed and wanting it to stop?
deleted by creator
Marxism is about uniting the forces of change, and keeping them united and strong so that they can fight and win a revolution. Read Mao's Little Red Book.
No, you don't want to unite all of the forces of change. Some of the forces of change are nazis. Some forces of change should be left out of the revolution
deleted by creator
Nazis are reactionary not revolutionary.
Compromising with the forces of reaction = liberalism
Disintegrating the forces of revolution = wrecking