• Zoift [he/him]
    ·
    a year ago
    1. He traveled to start shit. He didnt work, live, or have family at a car lot.

    2. His intent was to start shit. "Protecting" an empty car lot is the most hamfisted shitlib handwaving. Muh Private Property!

    3. Legally speaking, nobody gives a shit nerd.

    4. Once again, nobody gives a fuck about the banality of gun laws.

    5. He acted like a dipshit cracker, theres your nuance

    6. Kyle, and everyone who thinks he's cool, should throw a clot. That should be specific enough.

      • Zoift [he/him]
        ·
        a year ago
        1. Hell yeah, drown me in banality baby. Tell me about his deep meaningful connection to secondhand autosales.

        2. Protecting private property, hell yeah, jerk me harder locke. When i grab guns to head to a counterprotest, its because i care so much about classical conceptions of property rights.

        3. I could go on a tangent about bourgeois "Legal frameworks", but its much easier to say "Death to America" and move on.

        4. America delenda est

        5. I dont respect you, or your opinions.

        6. We can do both & the only thing worth constructing here is a pit.

      • ZapataCadabra [he/him]
        ·
        a year ago

        While you may disagree with his reasons, there are individuals who genuinely believe in protecting private property during unrest. It's a complex issue that shouldn't be reduced to simplistic labels.

        So you think broken windows are more important than the lives of black people. You're a bad person and I hope you get to read that before you get banned.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]
          ·
          a year ago

          Protecting private property justifies ANY violence, sweety very-intelligent

      • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
        ·
        a year ago

        there are individuals who genuinely believe in protecting private property during unrest

        and those people should be fucking drowned

        • Smeagolicious [they/them]
          ·
          a year ago

          Drowning is fine and good but I still prefer the pit. Compromise solution, we add some water to the nazi pit - a permanent dunk tank if you willl

          pit

          🌊🌊🌊

          • barrbaric [he/him]
            ·
            a year ago

            But what if the water provides too much cushioning when they hit the bottom?

            • Egon
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              deleted by creator

        • CannotSleep420
          ·
          a year ago

          I'm more of a light them on fire kinda guy.

        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
          ·
          a year ago

          I've got a bridge they can protect.

          They can protect it best standing right between the supports... yes, right there.

      • Egon
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • PandaBearGreen [they/them]
          ·
          a year ago

          It's hilarious when people act like legality is somehow the real world or just in any sense.

          • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
            ·
            a year ago

            Reminds me of an adviser to Trump who suggested drone bombing refugees before they reached the US because they wouldn't be protected by the constitution at that point.

      • silent_water [she/her]
        ·
        a year ago

        property is just stuff you fuckhead. blowing away lives for things is always wrong. what the fuck is wrong with you.