I know that these people are ontologically evil but a 9-0 vote is still a little mind-boggling.

  • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    "While I am disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision in the Sackett case, EPA and Army have an obligation to apply this decision alongside our state co-regulators, Tribes, and partners," EPA Administrator Michael Regan said in a statement.

    No. Wrong. Incorrect. You have an obligation to protect the environment. You have no obligation at all whatsoever to listen to the Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court is not a body with any authority and can and should be ignored.