You can’t “debunk” Marxism by skimming the Wikipedia page. You can’t expound on your infantile “critique” from a position of total ignorance.

Every time a liberal “debunks” Marxism it is, without fail, not a single exception, the exact same shit that was discredited 150 years ago. A lot of “Marx didn’t consider”s that he’s written entire essays on. They can’t come up with literally anything new, spewing the same shit over and over again like a broken record.

Are liberals allergic to academic honesty?

And no I am not German I stole the screenshot.

    • Annakah69 [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can try. PBS did a pretty good 20 min video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JnKzt6Xq-w4.

      My summary, we have proven that local reality isn't real. What that means is particles don't have a fixed location/spin etc. Recent nobel prize winners proved this at a galactic scale. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/

      Most physicists believe this applies to the entire universe. However there is a loop hole, which is a theory that past events happened which set those particles characteristics. Or in otherwords position isn't determined by probability, it's determined by hidden variables and if we looked far enough into the past we'd be able to determine what those variables are. That theory is super determinism.

      One more link: https://www.essentiafoundation.org/the-fantasy-behind-sabine-hossenfelders-superdeterminism/reading/