• AcidSmiley [she/her]
    ·
    10 months ago

    I absolutely do not count that one, unless we assume that "turn the place into a civil war economy and enable the formation of ISIS" is a valid win condition. Which is a stretch when they went in there expecting to turn it into an obedient vassal state like postwar Germany or Japan, which is something that Dubya's administration seems to have seriously believed.

    • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      DC's architects made their money off of rebuilding, mercenaries, and corruption. I'm pretty sure they count it as a win regardless of what ever humble pie the media made them eat for that brief period America pretended to care, back in... 2015/2016, was it?

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      ·
      10 months ago

      It only works under the very narrow criteria of “removing Saddam from power,” but yeah by any other metric it was a boondoggle of the highest order. A sort of, I got rid of the wasp’s nest in the attic, I just caused a five alarm fire in the process.

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]
        ·
        10 months ago

        Absolutely. What worries me about Iraq is that it may have tought the US that they do not need to be successful, but that it can already benefit them when they just fuck shit up for real in a strategically important corner of the globe.

        • PKMKII [none/use name]
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah there’s been a distinct shift in pentagon mentality where they don’t see wars as things to be won, but things to be managed.