I guess my main point of confusion is why would they fake two different attacks instead of just faking one attack (the twin towers) and calling it a day. No one cares or even remembers about the Pentagon attack, so why bother shooting a missile at it?
To get rid of documents and people that were in that section of the Pentagon that was incinerated without risk of whistleblowers or suspicion of they just randomly disappeared a bunch of files and employees
Yeah documents get destroyed as part of "routine housekeeping" all the time, why would they need to blow up their own building for these? And its not like the US needs an excuse to invade the middle east or get its dipshit citizens to vote for more surveillance on themselves
That renovation story totally sounds like a coverup
"When American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the southwest corner of the Pentagon, 184 people were killed — 64 who were on the plane and 125 people in the building. "
What whistleblowers and files were they trying to destroy? I thought the false flag was to get the public on board with invading Afghanistan and Iraq. What were the whistleblowers whistleblowing about?
You don't need a missile to destroy documents. Auditors routinely get owned by "Documents? What documents? You must be mistaken. Those documents never existed my dude." and "Oops, Bob the intern accidentally shredded those documents. And those documents. And coincidentally every single document that would incriminate us." We're talking about a government agency that has never once passed an audit lol
Towers = tall, everybody will see the missiles
Also the Pentagon collapsing out of nowhere from a demolition doesn't make sense at all
I guess my main point of confusion is why would they fake two different attacks instead of just faking one attack (the twin towers) and calling it a day. No one cares or even remembers about the Pentagon attack, so why bother shooting a missile at it?
To get rid of documents and people that were in that section of the Pentagon that was incinerated without risk of whistleblowers or suspicion of they just randomly disappeared a bunch of files and employees
deleted by creator
Yeah documents get destroyed as part of "routine housekeeping" all the time, why would they need to blow up their own building for these? And its not like the US needs an excuse to invade the middle east or get its dipshit citizens to vote for more surveillance on themselves
That renovation story totally sounds like a coverup
"When American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the southwest corner of the Pentagon, 184 people were killed — 64 who were on the plane and 125 people in the building. "
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/9-11-memorial-events-22-years-since-attack-remember-those-who-died/
deleted by creator
Absolutely not, I'm just
in spirit of 9/11
What whistleblowers and files were they trying to destroy? I thought the false flag was to get the public on board with invading Afghanistan and Iraq. What were the whistleblowers whistleblowing about?
deleted by creator
You don't need a missile to destroy documents. Auditors routinely get owned by "Documents? What documents? You must be mistaken. Those documents never existed my dude." and "Oops, Bob the intern accidentally shredded those documents. And those documents. And coincidentally every single document that would incriminate us." We're talking about a government agency that has never once passed an audit lol
deleted by creator