The only way I can read it in a generous light is they are claiming Russia is over focusing on the front line to ensure no "victories" can be claimed.
That might hint that should a front line position be lost the fallback lines are not well defended? The other implication is that lots of "damage" is being done with no land gains? But I am just guessing what they mean and if it's the second point, yuck.
Yea it's funny. But you know what they are trying to say.
I really have no idea what they meant.
lol
The only way I can read it in a generous light is they are claiming Russia is over focusing on the front line to ensure no "victories" can be claimed.
That might hint that should a front line position be lost the fallback lines are not well defended? The other implication is that lots of "damage" is being done with no land gains? But I am just guessing what they mean and if it's the second point, yuck.