https://archive.is/20231109141208/https://www.economist.com/china/2023/11/09/china-wants-women-to-stay-home-and-bear-children

Show
It's hilarious that capitalist rags like the economist want their lib readers to fear Xi by making him out to be some authoritarian conservative.

Also funny: central government wants local governments to invest in good toilets, the gall! How dare they support improving public services! wojak-nooo

Show

https://archive.is/20231109140845/https://www.economist.com/china/2023/11/09/xi-jinping-wants-china-to-have-better-toilets

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The advancement of women's cause not only facilitates individual development of women, but also promotes family and social harmony as well as the development of the country and the Chinese nation, he said.

    It is necessary to strengthen guidance on young people's perspectives on marriage, childbearing and family, he said, urging women's federations to fine-tune and implement supportive birth policies, enhance the quality of population development and respond to population aging.

    Noting that protecting the legitimate rights and interests of women and children, promoting gender equality and the all-round development of women and children are important components of Chinese modernization, Xi called on women's federations at all levels to intensify efforts to solve the prominent problems that affect and infringe on the rights and interests of women and children.

    So sinister... If you cut and paste around all the bits where he talks about advancing and protecting women's rights.

    He asked women's federations to conduct in-depth investigations to gain insight into the thoughts and aspirations of women at the grassroots level and understand the urgent needs of the cause of women's development.

    Nooooo you can't just ask women's organizations to investigate and understand the urgent needs of women, you PATRIARCH!

    Source

    • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If I don't frame them as evil patriarchs, how will my lib readers learn to hate anything to the left of them? wojak-nooo

      Thanks for the source, I'll give it a read very-smart

    • CrimsonSage [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It's basically government boilerplate either way. What matters is the material outcomes for women, which as far as i know is about the same as here a mix if good and bad. So it's just racist hysterics by the economists. I'll also note they don't mention the new push against no fault divorce by right wingers in this country which is basically a right to abuse your wife law.