I struggle with this because sometimes I do have a legitimate response to a chud arguing in bad faith, so I do the whole arguing for other people thing where I post a long argument mostly for other people to read rather than what I maybe should do, which is “post hog.”
There is a certain persuasive logic to chud arguments, and sometimes it feels like if I have a legitimate counter to them, even if i know they’re arguing in bad faith, I can’t help but post a long response so other people, maybe with less developed leftist thought at risk of falling for the chud arguments or something, will see
I struggle with this because sometimes I do have a legitimate response to a chud arguing in bad faith, so I do the whole arguing for other people thing where I post a long argument mostly for other people to read rather than what I maybe should do, which is “post hog.”
There is a certain persuasive logic to chud arguments, and sometimes it feels like if I have a legitimate counter to them, even if i know they’re arguing in bad faith, I can’t help but post a long response so other people, maybe with less developed leftist thought at risk of falling for the chud arguments or something, will see
That's fine, you have the rest of your comrades to demand hog and/or ppb etc...
"Combined genre posting" or something like that
Combined Arms Posting Doctrine
good post!
I think it’s valuable because it’s always possible they or a confused lurker is reading in good faith
diversity of tactics is a good thing.