I am a bit unconfident about it...

Here, to give a basis of the argument I need to debunk, here's an article from right-libertarian think tank Reason.com to respond to:

https://reason.com/volokh/2021/04/24/race-and-violent-crime/

Blacks, which here means non-Hispanic blacks, were 12.5% of the U.S. population, and non-Hispanic whites were 60.4%. It thus appears from this data that the black per capita violent crime rate is roughly 2.3 to 2.8 times the rate for the country as a whole, while the white per capita violent crime rate is roughly 0.7 to 0.9 times the rate for the country as a whole.

Note: keep in mind he's extrapolating a certain part of the U.S, New York, to the rest of America's national crime statistics

Something in the vein of a masterpost like Naomi's research and rhetoric masterdoc

Easily understandable and accessible, yet with a great amount of statistics put upon it

    • mkultrawide [any]
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, yeah, but some losers really do have to be shown this shit lol.

        • mkultrawide [any]
          ·
          10 months ago

          I'm not sure how I'm accepting the premise? The "racial" connection breaks down because it doesn't explain crime rates among poor whites. When you factor in income inequality, it explains crime rates across races and race ends up not being a statistically significant predictor.

          • thirtymilliondeadfish [she/her]
            ·
            10 months ago

            No not you! Sorry, I meant the 'argument' itself is bunkum, and only used to further denigrate black people/imply innate criminality.