i don't know why i'm responding to this, but whatever. doing this all in one post, but i'm responding to both of yours, which is why this is so long. it's also long because i'm actually responding to the things you say, which isn't something you seem to know how to do

first things first, that substack you linked. many things wrong there. immediately, you're invoking 'i know a jewish person who says it's fine.' ok, on my end i know jewish people who think it is extremely not fine. in fact they were the ones who explained to me why the goblins in harry potter are problematic. second, having read the article it just blatantly lies in its base premise.

Goblins, the fantasy creature that has existed in various incarnations for centuries, may have initially been based on antisemitic stereotypes - short, big noses, greedy money-hoarders. Therefore, fantasy that depicts goblins (even if in a complex or sympathetic way that subverts some of the tropes) is automatically inherently antisemitic because goblins are representing Jews, and doing it in the most harmful stereotypical way possible. (note that I have yet to personally see this standard applied to a fantasy series other than HP)

this just isn't a claim anyone is making. the claims about harry potter are much more specific about that. there are antisemitic tropes in the water surrounding goblins, but jkr ramped that up dramatically. this author just breezes past the fact that the goblins are bankers which is a whole lot more specific than a generic greed! people don't say that shit about tolkien (as much, because people do rightly point out problematic elements in tolkien's goblins quite a bit if you don't ignore that to try and lie about how people are being mean to a bigoted billionaire) because tolkien goblins don't run the banks!!! this shit is so blatant it's unsurprising anyone trying to carry water for rowling has to just ignore it

she also claims that there's no actual child kidnapping in the game, and that if there was it would be fine because other fantasy stories contain bits where people kidnap children to use their blood. i'm pretty sure the first point is untrue, because i can find many references to the goblins wanting to use the main character (who is 15 years old, so firmly a child)'s blood for a ritual, but i haven't played the game and am not going to so i suppose it's possible everyone referencing this just made it up in some kind of mass hysteria for some reason. but crucially that second bit is such bullshit it doesn't matter. the problem is taking all these things together! when you have someone stealing a child's blood for a magic ritual that is not problematic or blood libel on its own, but it becomes so once you have it done by members of the greedy hook nosed race that run the banks and don't think it's possible to own property and prefer to eat raw bloody meat and stab the heroes in the back and have stars of david on the floors of their banks. that shit is antisemitic, a lot more so than the culture broadly already is.

similarly it isn't a pogrom when violence against goblins happens in other fantasy media because those goblins don't run the banks and aren't nearly as coded!!!!! what are you even fucking talking about!!!! anyways as you can see i read her whole piece and it was all wrong and poorly argued. next!

sorry this is so long it had to be split up anyways, despite my efforts. you're just too wrong to fit into the character limit!