I made a stupid comment. I will reflect on how I spoke without a full investigation.

EDIT: [I made a stupid comment. I will reflect on how I spoke without a full investigation.]

dialectical_materialism

Awesome! I haven't made the switch to Linux yet, but DXVK has more often than not given me some performance boosts in more demanding games on Windows.

For Harris/Walz, offering anything was too much. Other than more genocide, that is.

American voters are like units in RTS games: if you don't given them specific orders, they'll either do nothing or go off and do the dumbest shit without any logical explanation.

Alfred Hitchcock explaining the difference between surprise and suspense (in Minecraft).

https://www.shanghaidisneyresort.com/en/attractions/adventures-winnie-pooh/

Course-correcting on a few key issues might have been enough to net the couple hundred thousand votes necessary to eke out an EC victory, but instead she told potential supporters to shut up ("I'm speaking!") while pursuing endorsements from Liz and Dick fucking Cheney. Hoe-lee shit.

Guys, gals and enby pals will look at this and go "Hell yeah!"

helluva_boss, gynomorph, looking_at_viewer, female_penetrating (*delete if too horni)

You metaphor is foolish and you should keep you scat fetish to yourself.

They want maximum results for minimum effort, then whine when they don't get everything handed to them. They're the DarksydePhils of electoralism.

Friend, not food.

Questions reportedly included "Can you do this again and more often?" and "How many more 2000lbs bombs can we give you?"

Please, elaborate.

It's a math joke ("""joke""") about misunderstanding the intent behind written problems, as poorly-written problems can be interpreted in multiple ways, but well-written problems are (almost) always correctly interpreted by reasonably math literate folks. The fact the you arrived at two different solutions means that you correctly interpreted the intent behind both problems.