Addressing participants in the international Symposium "Man-Woman: Image of God.” Pope Francis describes so-called gender ideology as the "ugliest danger" of our time, because it cancels out all differences that make humanity.

Pope Francis on Friday again spoke out against gender theory describing it as an “ugly ideology of our time”, because it erases all distinctions between men and women. To ceancel this difference “is to erase humanity. Man and woman, instead, exist in a fruitful ‘tension’”, he said.

The Symposium

The remarks came as he opened his address to participants in the international Symposium "Man-Woman: Image of God. Towards an Anthropology of Vocations" held in the Vatican on March 1-2.

The Congress is organized by Cardinal Marc Ouellet, Prefect Emeritus of the Dicastery for Bishops, together with the Centre for Research and Anthropology of Vocations (CRAV) and is a follow-up to the previous 2022 Symposium dedicated to the theology of the priesthood.

Introducing his address the Pope said he still has a cold and asked his assistant Monsignor Filippo Ciampanelli to read it out for him, "so I don't get so fatigued.”

In the prepared text the Pope reflected on the theme of the Congress which is aimed first of all at highlighting the anthropological dimension of every vocation.

The human person is a vocation

Indeed, he remarked, “the life of the human being is a vocation” which has a relational character: “I exist and live in relation to who generated me, to the reality that transcends me, to others and to the world around me, in which I am called to embrace a specific and personal mission with joy and responsibility.”

“Each one of us discovers and expresses oneself as called, as a person who realizes oneself in listening and response, sharing our being and gifts with others for the common good.”

This fundamental anthropological truth is sometimes overlooked in today's cultural context, where human beings tend to be reduced to their mere material and primary needs. Yet, Pope Francis said , they are more than this: created by God in His own image, man and woman “carry within themselves a desire for eternity and happiness that God himself has planted in their hearts and that they are called to fulfil through a specific vocation.”

“Our being in the world is not a mere fruit of chance, but we are part of a design of love and are invited to go out of ourselves and realize it, for ourselves and for others,” the Pope said.

“We are called to happiness, to the fullness of life, to something great to which God has destined us.”

We all have a mission in Church and society

Recalling Cardinal Saint John Henry Newman’s “Meditations and Prayers” Pope Francis further remarked that not only we have all been entrusted with a mission, but ”each and every one of us is a mission.”

The Pope therefore welcomed the symposium and the studies conducted on this topic because, he said, “they spread awareness of the vocation to which every human being is called by God”, and are also useful to reflect on today’s challenges, on the ongoing anthropological crisis, and on the need to promote human and Christian vocations.

Promoting a more effective "circularity" of vocations

He also emphasized the importance of promoting “a more effective circularity” of the different types of vocations in the Church, including lay vocations, ordained ministry and consecrated life, so they “can contribute to generating hope in a world overwhelmed by death.”

“Generating this hope, placing oneself at the service of the Kingdom of God to build an open and fraternal world is a mission entrusted to every woman and man of our time,” he said.

The courage to seek God’s will

Closing his address, Pope Francis encouraged the participants in the Symposium not to shy away from risks in seeking God’s will in their work, reminding them a living faith is not an artifact in a museum:”The Holy Spirit asks us fidelity, but fidelity moves, and often leads us to take risks”, he said.

“Move forward with the courage to discern and risk seeking God's will.”
  • Kaplya
    ·
    4 months ago

    That the Catholic Church is somehow a uniquely progressive brand of Christianity is certainly one of the most brainwormed takes I’ve seen on this site. Rarely have I ever rolled my eyes so hard when reading the stuff here.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      "Liberation theology" is being constantly pushed as example. I would say, it's a good example... of how the most progressive movement inside catholicism is still conservative, class collaborationist ideology which furthermore did not achieved anything notable and is only mildly progressive compared to the typical Latin American compradors, fash and juntas.

      • VILenin [he/him]M
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wonder how many of those who push it have read, like, any theological documents regarding it. Can’t count the number of times I’ve seen this no-investigation behavior.

        Also, why should we try to fix religion when we have materialism right here?

        • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s a difference between abolishing currently existing forms of religion and saying that no human spiritual belief should ever form again. I’m not sure if the second is even healthy, especially with how many unexplainable things exist. I guess that’s irrelevant to bring up though, fuck Christians

          • VILenin [he/him]M
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I guess that’s irrelevant to bring up though

            It is. Instead of countering the materialist argument you brought up an irrelevant trope about how science can’t explain everything and shifted from religion to a vague “spirituality”.

            fuck Christians

            Ok.

            Must have hallucinated my religious trauma. Kindly fuck off with this contrarian shit

            • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Ok.

              Must have hallucinated my religious trauma. Kindly fuck off with this contrarian shit

              I’m kind of confused here, I’m concerned maybe I was read as sarcastic? I could see that, sorry I wrote it in kind of a catty tone I didn’t intend to convey.

              I meant it genuinely. The trope I was giving isn’t a defense of Christianity at all, moreso vague obscure and/or currently nonexistent forms of spirituality that haven’t been constructed yet. I’m not trying to invalidate your trauma and I’m sorry I was.

              If you have religious trauma with some other form of religion, possibly some kind of more obscure religion that still hurt you a lot, than not only am I willing to admit that obscure religions can be bad, but that non-materialist views of reality ARE dangerous in general and that I don’t know what kind of spirituality I’m talking about would even look like

    • theposterformerlyknownasgood
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is definitely up there. But I saw someone claiming that the catholic church was the victim of genocide at the hands of the socialists in Spain in the 1930s on here and my brain has never recovered.

      • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        4 months ago

        iirc their argument was that it technically met the definition, then cited the definition to demonstrate how. I remember them specifically saying they weren't making a moral judgement on whether or not the socialist were right to target the catholic church. Just saying their actions met the definition that we have. shrug The back and forth about that one felt pretty low stakes and silly to me because it just seemed like semantics.

        • theposterformerlyknownasgood
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It's not semantics to invent a genocide for socialists to have committed actually. Also I cannot stress how much calling a movement genocidal is a moral judgement. Like come on. If you call anticlericalism at a time where the clerics are making kill lists for the fascists "genocide" you're making a moral argument, and it's an unhinged one.

        • theposterformerlyknownasgood
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Reciprocal genocide is hardly a morally valid act, especially given that the socialists of Spain are not meaningfully the inheritors of the victimization of the Cathars by the French. I also feel like you could name more relevant and newer acts if you did want to that happened since the Albigensian crusade in 1229. The relevant thing is that there was no genocide of Catholics in the 1930s in Spain. Like it's not a thing.

          • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            4 months ago

            I know that there was no genocide of catholics in Spain. Nor would I support the killing of innocents who happened to be catholic.

            the catholic church was the victim of genocide

            I was saying that the catholic church specifically would deserve it.

            Also I personally identify quite strongly with a lot of Cathar ideology so it's relevant to me. And I like to bring it up when I can, as most people and especially catholics don't know about it. The catholic church butchered over two million people for the "crime" of having a better religion and not being oppressive freaks.