We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
Because they believe Stalin was worse than Hitler.
Then they should put their nuts on the table and admit they're hitlerites.
Is that how you're supposed to identify Nazis?
Oh, man, I've been going about this all wrong. Thanks!