Actually, he is right - but of course speaking from a lib's perspective. He sees those two factions of the bourgeois state and decries that they're fighting - after all, they should not and have the state run efficiently in whatever it is doing right now.
Left and Right for the most part also seek to maintain the state as is right now - not abolish it in favor of a proletarian one. Internationalism, socialism, etc., both the state and him do not want that and would fight if the working class organized in that direction. He wants the two sides of liberalism to come together into one, as a nationalistic whole (and indeed, if push comes to shove and the current partisan conflict in the US escalates, he probably will pick the stronger side, favor the one he views as more likely to keep the bourgeois state alive, and repress the other one for being traitors etc.). As usual, the seed of fascism being already present in liberal worldviews.
Smart, but of course not to the advantage of the communist movement.
Actually, he is right - but of course speaking from a lib's perspective. He sees those two factions of the bourgeois state and decries that they're fighting - after all, they should not and have the state run efficiently in whatever it is doing right now.
Left and Right for the most part also seek to maintain the state as is right now - not abolish it in favor of a proletarian one. Internationalism, socialism, etc., both the state and him do not want that and would fight if the working class organized in that direction. He wants the two sides of liberalism to come together into one, as a nationalistic whole (and indeed, if push comes to shove and the current partisan conflict in the US escalates, he probably will pick the stronger side, favor the one he views as more likely to keep the bourgeois state alive, and repress the other one for being traitors etc.). As usual, the seed of fascism being already present in liberal worldviews.
Smart, but of course not to the advantage of the communist movement.