PC and monster weaknesses are very easy to look up and apply, but finding out what the actual people at the table will fall for is a lot harder, so what have you noticed your players always get pulled in by?

  • PointAndClique [they/them]
    hexbear
    7
    3 months ago

    I've never sat on the other side of the GM screem but am interested in the replies to this thread all the same :)

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
      hexagon
      hexbear
      6
      3 months ago

      If you know any of your own it's always worth sharing - other people might find them useful.
      I know I'm a sucker for traps. I can't quite explain how I always know they're there - I think it's related to GM's poker faces and the extra things they do or don't say and do when they're trying to conceal them - but I immediately start looking for a way to set them off, and often play impulsive characters just so I can "carelessly" trigger them. When I'm playing smarter characters I'll try to bait other PCs into triggering them.
      Weirdly, not that bothered about including them as a GM. Sometimes I like to include them as an extra complication in a fight, but a lot of the time I just don't find them an interesting way to "trick" players. I sometimes wonder if I do it as a player as much for the GM's enjoyment as my own.

      • PointAndClique [they/them]
        hexbear
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah I reflected a bit, I guess it's hard to understand which are my player preferences that I've built into my PC, and what I reveal beyond that. So for example, I find it frustrating when co-players refuse to take the plot bait, and overintelectualise their decisions to play 'against' the GM. So the characters I play tend to be, similar to how you mentioned, naive or impulsive so I can make the rash decisions to keep the plot moving.

        I'm also aware of talking too much or holding the spotlight too long or too often. If I have a 'big' moment I'll often just stay low key and give minimal input for a good while/the rest of the session so others can take focus. I wouldn't mind if my GMs recognised this and played to it (challenge it), like it could force both me and my character into scenarios where I would instinctively back off. If they played around it (accommodate it), they could set my character up with an in-world mystery to mull over in the background which explains why I'm taking a back seat.