What do you think of the following terms?
-
People of Gaza
-
Gazans
I've been using "Gazans". It feels natural for me to use demonym even though "people of Gaza" has its supporters. For example - I assume Norman Finkelstein always uses "people of Gaza" and never "Gazans" in writing. And when he speaks it's probably the same.
A couple times in the bulletin stickies I used the non-term "West Bankers" because for me "Palestinians in the West Bank" is such an unnaturalistic mouthful.
---
I wish there was a second form of double quotation marks just for text so it's clear the words in quotes aren't being used as "scare quotes" or in an "ironic" way.
---
About the photo. It's from a 6 year-old article titled...
Gaza City in the spotlight: hesitant hope in a city where everyone still wants out
Purely personally, i think either works. I like "people of" or "x people" because i think it removes a level of abstraction to actually say "people". Like i usually say " Jewish People" instead of Jews, or "Hadza People" instead of Hadza as I think it pre-empts dehumanization of the other.
Re: west bank, i'm trying to learn and remember which towns actually comprise the west bank but i'm not doing a very good job.