Much of the preamble has been sourced from Michael Roberts' recent analysis of Mexico.
Claudia Sheinbaum, part of the left-wing and populist Morena party to which AMLO also belongs, is now the first woman to ascend to the Mexican presidency. She is also a climate/energy scientist and was previously mayor of Mexico City. Results indicate that she has won with approximately 60% of the vote, which would be the highest vote percentage in Mexican history.
AMLO's presidency has been generally successful. He campaigned on reducing violence inside Mexico, and while this has technically occurred if measured from 2018, homicides are still considerably higher than in 2010. This is largely due to warring drug cartels, which are more reflective of the United States and its rise in drug addiction and thus imports from Mexico. He also campaigned on reducing corruption, which he also kinda has, and also on reducing income inequality, which he also kinda has. The overall figures don't show massive budges in income inequality, but the minimum wage has risen by 82% and manufacturing wage have risen 27%, and this plus other social programs has lifted 9 million Mexicans out of extreme poverty - a good achievement - but not much further than that, with poverty rates still above the Latin American average. Unemployment is officially at record lows, but much of this job growth has been in the informal sector.
The Mexican economy suffered greatly during the pandemic, and while growth since then has been pretty decent, the economy is still below where it was in 2018. As Mexican capitalists do not pay much in taxes, AMLO's programs have required large budget deficits and borrowing. These capitalists are, of course, not doing many productive investments and thus there is not much productivity growth; productivity has been more-or-less stagnant for two decades. The reason why Mexican capitalists are not investing is because of the major decline in profitability since the 1990s - there is no reason to invest if your money is at major risk of not making a profit. Therefore, they have followed the trend of other national capitalists of investing in real estate and speculation, particularly in American companies.
Since NAFTA/USMCA, Mexico has become increasingly dependent on the United States for a location for its exports, while the US has exploited cheap labour in Mexico. Additionally, with the anti-Chinese sanctions increasingly put in place by the US, Mexico has become one of several conduits for China to redirect its goods so that they can still reach American markets. This has allowed Mexico to have an essentially balanced trade account and keep the peso relatively strong against the dollar.
Mexico's limited fortunes will likely decline from here as the US economy continues to slow. If Trump is elected, he may decree protectionist policies which will hit a US-reliant Mexico quite hard. Additionally, industrial production has recently declined and retail spending is also down. AMLO's presidency was genuinely beneficial for the poorest 50%, but the policies he created failed to really change the fundamentals of the economy. He relied on the private sector rather than the public sector. This is not entirely his fault - if he had tried to do anything terribly transformative, Mexico would have probably been hit hard with consequences by the US and simultaneously faced a domestic revolt by Mexican capitalists. There were and are already threats of outright invasion in response to the limited things AMLO has already done.
In an increasingly multipolar future in which America becomes weaker and weaker, it's very possible that Mexico's reliance on the US will decrease, allowing parties to be more radical without facing the possibility of facing crippling sanctions like Venezuela. However, Mexico's sheer proximity to the US means that they might be among the last countries to break free of American influence, as the US will continue to bitterly resist any attempt to break down the Monroe Doctrine long after it loses Asia, Europe, and Africa. So, it seems likely that Sheinbaum may soon find herself in a situation where she is forced by capitalists to implement fiscal austerity regardless of her intentions, which is equivalent to a declaration of war on the working class. What happens then is anybody's guess.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Mexico! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
deleted by creator
I imagine a portion of the reason why is that the Chinese still do not think it's time to do so due to the fact that even though relations between the prc and the u.s are growing colder, it doesn't change the fact that significant buisness still occurs between the states. I'd imagine if there was a genuine decoupling then we'd more likely see a de-dollerization
deleted by creator
A lot has been said about the new Chinese electric and hybrid cars, and this is a perfect example of this. A lot of the more expensive and larger cars here are clearly designed with a foreign market/customer in mind, in paticular North American customers with the most extravagant and large "bazinga mobiles". China does not have the domestic market to buy stuff like this, and even they did, I'm pretty sure your average wealthy Chinese customer is not interested in bazinga mobiles designed for North American tastes. And neither is your average European. These larger vehicles are clearly made for the North American market. This is why the tariffs by the US on Chinese electric vehicles are a bigger deal than most think. What happens to all these cars, and the years of RnD used to produce them, without a market for them?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yeah but that was in the saloon and sedan market (see the Audi A8L), not the bazinga truck market.
China relies on USD for its foreign development projects, like Belt and Road. The dollar spends farther than pretty much any other currency, and the trade surplus with the US means that's China is sitting on a bunch of USD that it needs to do something with. Instead of buying US products with that money, it sends it back out in the form of infrastructure spending that benefits China, and US monetary policy effectively finances that strategy by keeping the value of the dollar high.
deleted by creator
I don't think there's a situation where the US "wins" because that's not really how it's happened in the past; the contender states are rising in opposition to the US as they are geopolitically bound to do. It wouldn't really matter if the contender states were capitalist or communist. Germany, Japan, and the United States rose as contender states to oppose the British Empire's much stronger hegemon and none of them were communist and the global currencies were at that point either the sterling or the gold standard, both of which the British Empire more-or-less controlled. Even in the absolute worst case scenario for the anti-hegemon and the absolute best case for the US, we're not looking at the US empire lasting past this century. Let's assume the worst happens and China's government topples and a capitalist one is instituted instead - they'd still be contending for the top spot in the arena of generating profit. And even as communists, China is caught up in the same global conditions as everybody else, the same generally lowering rate of profit as per the TRPF, the same development of neo-colonies, the same increasing difficulty to acquire resources as all the easy-to-access spots are taken up, etc.
I strongly dislike any theory which relies on a person or group of people having to "make the right choice" beyond that which their immediate interests lie. One of the many reasons I like Marxism is that it doesn't at all rely on, say, a person or group of people suddenly growing a heart and betraying the bourgeoisie as a prerequisite for the workers to institute a dictatorship of the proletariat. In a similar vein, at the geopolitical level, it shouldn't matter what the people inside China or Russia or the US want to happen, it shouldn't rely on, say, the Chinese leadership being presented with either dedollarization (growing a heart) or maintaining the dollar (acting selfishly and against their long-term interests) and then either choice shapes the future of the human race. It might not be inevitable per se, climate change or rampant disease or an asteroid impact might still get us of course.
But if we're in a situation where the only way out of US empire supremacy is a particular national government making a choice that works against their interests in the short term (as dedollarization would be a painful process for China) then we are very probably fucked.
Essentially what I'm trying to say is that if the US "wins", and neoliberalism prevails for decades or centuries, then Marxism must definitionally be incorrect. We must have made an incorrect judgement about the viability of capitalism, perhaps the rate of profit does not in fact fall over time, and the theory is wrong. Until somebody points out that fatal flaw, then I don't see how Marxism can be wrong. QED, the US will not win.
deleted by creator