jackmarxist [any] to chapotraphouse • 24 days ago289% Inflation lmaoimagemessage-square48 fedilinkarrow-up1214
arrow-up1214image289% Inflation lmaojackmarxist [any] to chapotraphouse • 24 days agomessage-square48 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareOwl [he/him]hexbear2·23 days agoHah, yeah. But on a real-world data set, even if the underlying phenomenon is e^x, you'll keep amplifying sample noise until the derivatives are basically random. Assuming you even have enough data to keep taking derivatives. link
This is e^x erasure
Hah, yeah.
But on a real-world data set, even if the underlying phenomenon is e^x, you'll keep amplifying sample noise until the derivatives are basically random. Assuming you even have enough data to keep taking derivatives.