Continuing with the rise in anger towards wrong think on world, it's now uncivil to post negative Biden articles.

*removed externally hosted image*

Shockly that comm looks just like r/politics now

  • TheDoctor [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Why now? Presumption of innocence. It may be my own fault, but I do try to think the best of people, and even though they were posting negative articles, they weren’t necessarily WRONG. Biden’s poll numbers, particularly in minority demographics ARE in the shitter.

    he-admit-it michael-laugh

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      hexagon
      ·
      5 months ago

      https://lemmy.world/comment/10468903

      Biden doesn’t have enough slips to merit the number of negative posts, and the absence of anything positive indicates he was only here to stir shit up.

      It IS possible to mention that Biden’s numbers are improving (they are) or that the (Murdoch owned) WSJ article was bullshit:

      https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4704853-white-house-wall-street-journal-biden/