https://www.businessinsider.com/houthis-getting-smarter-red-sea-attacks-ships-paying-the-price-2024-6

US officials have warned that the conflict has no signs of slowing down, and the growing financial toll has raised questions about the long-term sustainability of the counter-Houthi mission.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Not as much as you might think. It's 300km wide.

    The thinnest point is 30km off a very specific bit of Yemen. But the rest is so wide it's unpolicable. The warships have at best a 20-50km reliable range that they can cover around their ships. Their "watchful eyes" are less watchful than people realise and rely much more on being big and intimidating shows of force to deter action than their actual ability to prevent action by force.

    Unless you're from that one specific point where it's thinnest, and spend a lot of time on the shore, you probably don't end up thinking about this much at all. Well, except if you're from Yemen and have been bombed to bits for decades.

    • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      3 days ago

      well, that's what i mean... being around for one of the big, intimidating shows.

      and people go to the shore and watch ships. its a thing everywhere ive been, even isolated places where there isn't much human activity to see out there. living near a coast is a constant invitation to go to the coastline and stare out at the horizon. more so if there's a shipping lane or fishing boats or weather or some kind of activity, biological or artificial.

      if you live for 30 years in a coastal community where there has been significant foreign naval activity for hundreds or thousands of years, chances are high you've seen a foreign naval ship and considered the context.