Image is of Joseph Robinette Biden, who has stepped down and will not run against Trump in the 2024 election.


In the aftermath of Trump surviving an assassination attempt, many professional opinion-havers are now talking about the scourge of "political violence" that has overtaken, or will soon overtake America, and how we must not let chaos rule. This is, of course, patently absurd. The American government and its allies have been the greatest force of political violence on the planet since the beginning of colonialism, and the foundations of the country are made of corpses. Today, America commits political violence by forcing Ukrainians into the maw of Russian artillery instead of trying to reach a peaceful settlement, which Russia has repeatedly expressed interest in and offered Ukraine relatively favourable terms. They supply Israel with endless weaponry to destroy entire cities and populations, while Biden supporters insist that somehow things could be worse than daily massacres and mass starvation.

In May 1945, French police fired on protestors, causing retaliatory attacks on French settlers, killing about a hundred. In response, the French murdered 45,000 Algerians in a little under two months, in a frenzy of political violence called the Sétif and Guelma massacre. As the massacre was being completed, the International Court of Justice was established. It goes without saying that Algeria never benefited from the ICJ, and the War of Independence from 1954 to 1962 was made inevitable. Over a million Algerians were killed before France could bear the fighting no longer and gave up, and Algeria won itself a state. Comparisons to the ongoing war of independence and genocide in Palestine are obvious.

While the means of colonial violence have evolved over the centuries, the basic structure of it has not. As in Algeria, Vietnam, and Cuba, resistance groups in and around Palestine are fighting for a world with less political violence. The American government would drown every city in the developing world in blood to prevent peace.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is Algeria! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Neptium [comrade/them]
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Manila Times - China-built Laos railway could be a game changer for Asean connectivity

    VIENTIANE — A direct train service between the Thai capital Bangkok and Laotian capital Vientiane will begin on July 19, according to Thai Railway sources, that could herald a game changer for Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) connectivity, making the dream of a pan-Asian railway a step closer.

    Once this becomes a regular service, it would be possible to travel by train from Singapore to Beijing via Malaysia, Thailand and Laos.

    At Boten on the Laos-China border, when I visited an exhibition on the first floor of the multi-story headquarters of the Haicheng Development Group, a map of the planned railway connections across the Asean region caught my attention. ‌> The exhibits are focused on how the company plans to develop Boten into a modern metropolis like Singapore or Hong Kong — not with a modern port but a railway hub for the region. It shows how the railways coming from China and going through Boten to Laos, Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore would potentially make the region a nirvana for trade, tourism and cultural interaction.

    The China-built 414-kilometer-long railway across landlocked Laos, costing $5.9 billion, is the linchpin of the expanding connectivity across Southeast Asia. The Laos railway is a technological masterpiece that is becoming a major advertisement for China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) — even though it is often described as a "debt trap" by Western (and Japanese) media who point out that the project cost is about 39 percent of Laos' GDP, and that Laos will be choked with debt for at least two decades. But Laotians, who are now patronizing the trains in droves, dismiss any talk of a debt trap.

    "I don't see it as a debt trap. Most Laotians don't see it that way either," said a government development economist, who does not want to be named because he has no permission to speak to the media. "China has helped us to catapult into the 21st century. It is an economic opportunity for a landlocked nation. I would like to ask the critics, would you build it for us?"

    When I took the high-speed train recently from Boten — on the Chinese border — to Laos' capital Vientiane, I was greatly impressed with the efficiency of the service and the technological feat of building such a railway through some of the most rugged terrain in Asia, that included 74 tunnels. With just three stops on the way, you arrive at the Laotian capital in just over three hours, a journey that would have taken 2 to 3 days before the railway came.

    rest of the article

    The high-speed train is operated like an airline, with the stations in the main cities looking like airport terminals. Like at airports, passengers and baggage go through security x-ray machines, and they have to wait in a large transit hall with cafés and shops, until about five minutes before the train arrives, when their boarding tickets are checked before entering the platform. During the journey, while the train travels at between 150-160km/hr, cabin crew dressed like air hostesses go around with trolleys selling eats and drinks.

    "People fail to understand that Laos is a landlocked country, and logistically, we are disadvantaged at doing business with other countries. Laos shipments were going mainly through Thailand, and the costs were very high. This rail has high potential to assist Laos exports of minerals, agriculture and manufacturing produce to China and other countries," economics professor and vice president of Laos National University, Phouphet Kyophilavong, told IDN in an interview. "It's a big opportunity for us in terms of economic development. It should attract FDIs from China and other countries."

    "Before the railway, traveling to the north was very difficult. Roads were bad, too many accidents and other problems. Now even poor people can travel to Vientiane and other parts, less costly than bus and air," added Phouphet. The Laos-China Railway Company (LCR) that runs the rail system is a joint venture between three Chinese state-owned enterprises that collectively hold a 70 percent ownership stake and one Laos state-owned enterprise that owns 30 percent. The agreement was signed in 2016 as a build-operate-transfer (BOT) concession agreement with the government of Laos.

    Laos — which was a French colony for almost a century in the 19th and 20th centuries — never had a railway. Thus, the Chinese have set up the Laos Railway Vocational Training College in Vientiane to train a whole team of Laotians to run their railway. Twenty-year-old Fony Sulijul, who comes from a poor northern Laos village near Boten, is training at the college to become a railway technician. He told IDN that the railway is creating opportunities for young people in those remote areas to come to Vientiane to study because it wouldn't take 2 to 3 days to go back home — it takes less than 10 hours now. Chinese experts train While he studies Chinese at a local language school here in the evenings, during the day, he trains at the college to become a railway technician. "Chinese experts train us in working in the railway electrical system and its management. They teach in Chinese language but with Laos co-trainers," he said. "After finishing the three-year diploma course, I want to work for the Laos railway. I would like to be a train driver." He said that at present, the trains are driven by Chinese with a Laotian co-driver in the cabin.

    Fony said that the Chinese trainers tell them, "We want to train you and leave you to run the train system" in three years' time.

    The World Bank, in a report titled "Land-locked to Land-linked," published in 2020, said that if the countries undertake complementary policy reforms, the Laos-China railway could make Laos more attractive as an investment destination and link it to major production and consumption areas in China and the Asean region, allowing firms to access global value chains.

    "A number of planned export processing zones around train stations could serve as attractive investment locations, as long as they are properly equipped and effectively managed. With efficient logistics services, Laos PDR could develop into a logistics hub, while targeted investments in agriculture and tourism could result in new export opportunities," the report said, predicting that with proper government policies, trade flows between Laos and China could be increased three-fold via the rail network.

    Overseas critics have pointed out that the rail stations built in cities like Boten, Luang Prabang and Vientiane are 10 km or more from the city centers. But local development planners pointed out to IDN that this is a deliberate forward-looking strategy to develop industrial zones surrounded by new "villages" to spur economic activity and spread the populations from congested city centers.

    Already, container goods trains ply the rail network at regular intervals. Phouphet said he is currently doing a study on how to maximize the use of the railway and what policies the government needs to come up with.

    He argues that the Laos Railway project would take a long time to see economic returns. "But the social and economic impact on the society is already showing positive results. Surely, we have debts. But with China, we can negotiate on that," Phouphet says confidently. "China will not allow its neighbors to fail economically. Terms are always renegotiated. They (outsiders) always criticize Chinese loans. But this is a significant loan for Laos economic development."

    Bonus article by The Diplomat: Laos and China Use BRI-funded Railway to Bring Their Armies Together

    Western culture, built on centuries of colonial savagery and imperial domination, is incapable of conceptualising and understanding international relations without the use of force.

    • Greenleaf [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The phrase “you have to spend money to make money” is cliche, but it’s also true in many cases. That’s a lot of money but It’s also a pretty solid investment. At least China is loaning them money to build something that should absolutely pay for itself over time, based on what I’ve read. Compare that to the west, who if they were to loan money to Laos, it would used to buy currency to keep their Fx rates low; allowing exports to flow out of Laos that would give pennies to the Laotian people but pounds to the profits of western corporations. And what little assets they have become the west’s assets when they can’t pay the money back (and the loan isn’t structured for them to be able to pay it back).

      As that article says, Laos is very poor. They’re landlocked, very little industry, and not particularly resource-rich. And ohbytheway, it’s also really hard for them to farm their way out of poverty because something like one-fourth of their farmable land is currently unusable due to unexploded US bombs, which currently kill about 50 people per year (often little children, because cluster munitions can often look like toys). The United States can solve this problem and clear the ordnance and it’s not even a lot money. It could be done for the equivalent of a couple days of payments the US has made to Ukraine over the last couple years (taking total payments divided by days). It could be done for less money that Biden’s now-incapacitated Genocide Pier in Gaza. Obama promised to do something about it but to my knowledge nothing was ever done.

      So sure, it’s China who are the bad guys here…

      • ElHexo
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • MrPiss [he/him]
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would like to ask the critics, would you build it for us?

      The west had over 100 years to develop these countries including when they were almost directly governed by the west as colonies and they only ever got what could be used for raw resource extraction. China builds one fucking railroad and they're basically turned into Satan. Ultimately, who else is going to help them? Certainly not the Great Satan.

    • RNAi [he/him]
      ·
      4 months ago

      The South-Korean built Burj Khalifa