I hear some answers like "end the Zionist project" and things like that, but there no clarification as to what that entails (is it a one-state solution?).

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Israel is fully realized fascist state, it's gonna keep pursuing genocide until it ends up like Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan, which may include nuclear war....either way a mass exodus of settlers is inevitable

    The US may decide to send ground troops or they could cut their losses

    Has always if shit hits the fan, what really swings the long-term conflict is what Egypt decides to do

    • GlueBear [they/them, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 day ago

      Has always if shit hits the fan, what really swings the long-term conflict is what Egypt decides to do

      Not necessarily, economic warfare is brutal and attrition is not feasible for the entity. It might just be that a slow burn attritional war that breaks the entity from within. No one wants that nuclear settler project (or the other nuclear settler project that backs the former) to actually use their WMD. So external destruction of the entity (which is what I assume you believe Egypt might contribute towards) isn't necessary to dismantle the project.

      You can kinda see this with Ukraine and NATO. NATO and Ukraine want to escalate, but Ukraine wants permission to escalate past Russia's red lines. So obviously this isn't in NATO's interests, which is why Ukraine keeps asking for fancy weapons and permission to do deep strikes into Russia but will never receive either. No one wants nuke war with Russia and Russia doesn't want that either, hence attrition and the hope that the other side will break.