• Infamousblt [any]
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like this because then we can see who votes against it and know definitively who does and does not support this ongoing genocide

      • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
        ·
        2 months ago

        I'd say fence-sitting this vote is even more an indictment than just a "No" vote personally; it doesn't take a MENSA candidate to tell whether or not funding a genocidal morass of settlers is morally correct

        • Lussy [any, hy/hym]
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, saying ‘no comment’ to stopping a thing we’re already doing is just adding a meaningless word after the ‘no’

      • Infamousblt [any]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Still tells me everything I need to know. Silence is violence

      • Adkml [he/him]
        ·
        2 months ago

        That is a perfectly clear message for me actually.

        It's about opposing genocide or not. "Do nothing knowing that will cause the genocide to continue" is close enough to "continue the genocide" for me.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      ·
      2 months ago

      Someone will add something to the bill that will give any who need it an excuse to vote against.

      • Kuori [she/her]
        ·
        2 months ago

        and any who take it can be safely counted as monsters in support of a genocide, fuck what they say after the fact

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          ·
          2 months ago

          Expect that "something" added to be a thing that makes the bill a non-starter. Something like 'no assistance to Ukraine' or 'passport required to vote' or 'federal abortion pill ban', etc.